“The moment you send back a family of a Commie country with their infant, you’ve effectively destroyed any hope of that infant’s future, and the family’s already reduced ability to protect their child.”
I personally “destroyed any hope”? You are starting to make me feel bad - oh wait, that was my lunch backing up on me - sorry.
Lets be honest - if they were here requesting diplomatic immunity from one of those “Commie” countries, they would have already been given a suite at the Waldorf Astoria on my dollar! So, we are not talking about rampant Chinese take over of the US the last time I looked!
However, I have seen that Hispanics (from all over) ARE in fact coming here in droves and dropping babies left and right to get to stay here! Heck by your argument, we should INVADE Mexico, China and few of these other merciless countries - I mean it is for the good of the children!
My argument has nothing to do regarding the perversion of the “with the children” mantra argued by the left. This is a fundamental basic human rights position. I’m not in the business of, nor do I advocate, the systematic brainwashing of children, as the statement you are using intends to delineate. Don’t twist my position into something sinister.
I COMPLETELY agree that illegals should be sent back. The problem is that we aren’t ENFORCING the immigration laws on the books.
In fact, one of the ways to punish illegals would be to send them home and put their newly American-born children into an orphanage. This is what they’ve risked, so be it. Go back home, the child is no longer yours.
Want to see illegals tuck tail and go back? Take their children born here from them. THAT will make them run for the border before the birth.
Also, I noticed you didn’t even tackle the argument I used about Moses. He was of slave blood among the Masters. He (with the hand of God) changed the world.
IT’S NOT THE CHILD’S DECISION. If their country won’t acknowledge them, what then?
What happens to the child if the parents die, as in Elian Gonzalez, whose mother was in fact by statutory law a citizen? Clinton sent him back. You accuse me of taking a liberal slant, yet YOU are the one siding with Bill Clinton and Janet Reno!
Your position and argument are xenophobic at best. Believe what you want, I really don’t care. I’m just pointing out to you that it reeks of neglect and denial.