But isn't a SCOTUS ruling the law? And hasn't "law" always been nothing but a combination of court rulings and legislative acts? And as such, law is always subject to challenge, interpretation and amendment, isn't it?
In my opinion, this should be challenged. I applaud the preacher for having the stones to step up. Tyranny never sleeps.
If he wants to challenge, great, have at it. More power to him, but a better way would be to challenge in the courts by filing suite, unless he wants to provoke an incident. In that case, his choice, but no whining allowed, and this guy whines like a little girl. Oh, and how about getting the basic facts straight.