Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Hulka
It is law, not SCOTUS ruling.

But isn't a SCOTUS ruling the law? And hasn't "law" always been nothing but a combination of court rulings and legislative acts? And as such, law is always subject to challenge, interpretation and amendment, isn't it?

In my opinion, this should be challenged. I applaud the preacher for having the stones to step up. Tyranny never sleeps.

58 posted on 05/22/2009 6:52:49 AM PDT by abb ("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS." Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]


To: abb
Law is enacted by the Legislative Branch. the SCOTUS is supposed to make sure the law is constitutional. (We all know how well that works, and with leftists going to the courts to make law instead of interpreting it).

If he wants to challenge, great, have at it. More power to him, but a better way would be to challenge in the courts by filing suite, unless he wants to provoke an incident. In that case, his choice, but no whining allowed, and this guy whines like a little girl. Oh, and how about getting the basic facts straight.

60 posted on 05/22/2009 6:58:25 AM PDT by Hulka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson