The SCOTUS upheld the law.
It is law, not SCOTUS ruling.
But isn't a SCOTUS ruling the law? And hasn't "law" always been nothing but a combination of court rulings and legislative acts? And as such, law is always subject to challenge, interpretation and amendment, isn't it?
In my opinion, this should be challenged. I applaud the preacher for having the stones to step up. Tyranny never sleeps.