Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Girlene
Cheney's view on Gitmo and the interrogators:

......."For all that we’ve lost in this conflict, the United States has never lost its moral bearings. And when the moral reckoning turns to the men known as high-value terrorists, I can assure you they were neither innocent nor victims. As for those who asked them questions and got answers: they did the right thing, they made our country safer, and a lot of Americans are alive today because of them.

Like so many others who serve America, they are not the kind to insist on a thank-you. But I will always be grateful to each one of them,
and proud to have served with them for a time in the same cause. They, and so many others, have given honorable service to our country through all the difficulties and all the dangers. I will always admire them and wish them well. And I am confident that this nation will never take their work, their dedication, or their achievements, for granted. ".................

Vs. Obama's view on Gitmo:

.........."There is also no question that Guantanamo set back the moral authority that is America’s strongest currency in the world. Instead of building a durable framework for the struggle against al Qaeda that drew upon our deeply held values and traditions, our government was defending positions that undermined the rule of law. Indeed, part of the rationale for establishing Guantanamo in the first place was the misplaced notion that a prison there would be beyond the law – a proposition that the Supreme Court soundly rejected. Meanwhile, instead of serving as a tool to counter-terrorism, Guantanamo became a symbol that helped al Qaeda recruit terrorists to its cause. Indeed, the existence of Guantanamo likely created more terrorists around the world than it ever detained.

So the record is clear: rather than keep us safer, the prison at Guantanamo has weakened American national security.
It is a rallying cry for our enemies. It sets back the willingness of our allies to work with us in fighting an enemy that operates in scores of countries. By any measure, the costs of keeping it open far exceed the complications involved in closing it. That is why I argued that it should be closed throughout my campaign. And that is why I ordered it closed within one year. "..............
886 posted on 05/21/2009 9:31:04 AM PDT by Girlene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 871 | View Replies ]


To: kristinn
Somehow this seems appropriate.


892 posted on 05/21/2009 9:33:00 AM PDT by paulycy (BEWARE the LIBERAL/MEDIA Complex)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 886 | View Replies ]

To: Girlene
So the record is clear: rather than keep us safer, the prison at Guantanamo has weakened American national security. It is a rallying cry for our enemies. It sets back the willingness of our allies to work with us in fighting an enemy that operates in scores of countries. By any measure, the costs of keeping it open far exceed the complications involved in closing it. That is why I argued that it should be closed throughout my campaign. And that is why I ordered it closed within one year. "

I have no earthly idea where this bufoon gets his facts or information, but he's dead wrong. He could not prove one single fact in this entire sentence...not one.

It's just more cheerleading and campaign talk.

Only now, he's screwing around with the safety of myself and my family....and that I will not put up with.

"Speak bluntly. Euphemisms are interpreted as weakness by our enemies and mislead the American people. Speak of killing terrorists and destroying their organizations. Timid speech leads to timid actions. Explain when necessary, but do not apologize. Expressions of regret are never seen as a mark of decency by terrorists or their supporters, but only as a sign that our will is faltering. Blame the terrorists as the root cause whenever operations have unintended negative consequences. Never go on the rhetorical defensive.
And...

". Never accept the consensus of the Washington intelligentsia, which looks backward to past failures, not forward to future successes. "

And so we have an elected president that is declaring his intent to do harm - realy, physical harm - to the american people. Or, at least, has openly admitted that he has no wish to protect them or the constitution.

If these are not grounds for immediate impeachment and removal from office, I don't know what are.

918 posted on 05/21/2009 9:40:40 AM PDT by Logic n' Reason (GM = Gummint Motors.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 886 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson