Posted on 05/20/2009 8:07:15 AM PDT by lakeprincess
Tons of people are going to believe, this is what they have been waiting for. I said this yesterday, this is brilliant move, they don’t have to have it be true, truth cannot be known now, whatever they say in the media or put in our childrens school books is the truth. This is the most lethal strike you could imagine, this is the turning point, but most don’t realize it. The whole world wants it to be true, they just needed some rallying point, this is it. You have no idea what is coming next ...
Religion is an invention of man.
All I can say about this is, “Well I’ll be a lemur’s uncle”. Or the beautiful and touching song “I Want a Lemur, Just Like The Lemur, That Married Dear Old Dad”.
You bet. Remove religion from the public square and people begin to worship old monkey bones. That oughta prove something, too...
2 more missing links.
More like a link between primates and other mammals. Nothing to see, here, just the Idiot Channel trying to make some more $$ on ridiculous hype.
(It’s not even a monkey!)
>> He compared Ida to “an unknown Rembrandt,” explaining that forward-facing eyes, opposing big toes; short face and other features make her part of the anthropoid branch of mammals that include monkeys, apes and humans. <<
Crap! How come no-one told me everybody else has opposing big toes? No wonder the girl at PayLess kept looking at me funny. (I thought it was just the hole in my sock.)
Evolutionary biology is simply a description of the fossil record and living organisms.
Your statement makes no sense.
“Religion is an invention of man.”
Evolution isn’t?
Just saying.
You either think as the mind has developed through time or you relegate yourself to the pleasant poetry of a book, also written by man, and stagnate.
Oh, but it did!
Liberalis Universalis, found worlwide. As commonplace as weeds.
"What was wrong with all the other fossils over the years? Why get so excited with this one?" Ken Ham, president of Answers in Genesis and founder of the Creation Museum asked.
So let's get this straight. Those who reject evolutionary theory always complain, "There aren't enough transition fossils to 'prove' evolution", but yet when one comes along, the claim is, "What's wrong with all the other fossils; why get excited with this one?"?
What are you kidding me? Does no one but me see the double standard/goal post shifting here?
One lives in fear there is no god, the other works just as hard to prove there is a god.
Gads, you were not supposed to reveal that.
It is one thing to describe the fossils and living organisms, other to construct theories how they supposedly evolved one from another.
If you have a specific question, please ask.
“Evolution is a theory, same as Creation ‘science’.”
Theory is theory...why is “science” in quotes?
“You either think as the mind has developed through time or you relegate yourself to the pleasant poetry of a book, also written by man, and stagnate.”
Are you now going to tell us how many Angels can dance on the head of a pin?
“So let’s get this straight. Those who reject evolutionary theory always complain, “There aren’t enough transition fossils to ‘prove’ evolution”, but yet when one comes along, the claim is, “What’s wrong with all the other fossils; why get excited with this one?”?
Welllllll, there remains one definite missing link — between reality and the enthusiastic endorsements of this fossil as the Rosetta Stone of proof for evolution.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.