Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama Sets New Auto Emissions and Mileage Rules
New York Times ^ | May 20, 2009 | John M. Broder

Posted on 05/19/2009 11:30:25 AM PDT by reaganaut1

President Obama announced tough new nationwide rules for automobile emissions and mileage standards on Tuesday, embracing standards that California has sought to enact for years over the objections of the auto industry and the Bush administration.

“For the first time in history, we have set in motion a national policy aimed at both increasing gas mileage and decreasing greenhouse gas pollution for all new trucks and cars sold in the United States of America,” Mr. Obama said in remarks from Washington, flanked by officials from Michigan and California.

The rules, which will begin to take effect in 2012, will put in place a federal standard for fuel efficiency that is as tough as the California program, while imposing the first-ever limits on climate-altering gases from cars and trucks.

The effect will be a single new national standard that will create a car and light truck fleet in the United States that is almost 40 percent cleaner and more fuel-efficient by 2016 than it is today, with an average of 35.5 miles per gallon.

Environmental advocates and industry officials welcomed the new program, an accord that Mr. Obama said “would have been considered impossible” in the past.

But they welcomed it for different reasons. Environmentalists called it a long-overdue tightening of emissions and fuel economy standards after decades of government delay and industry opposition. Auto industry officials said it would provide the single national efficiency standard they have long desired, a reasonable timetable to meet it and the certainty they need to proceed with product development plans.

Yet the industry position represents an abrupt about-face after years of battling tougher mileage standards in the courts and in Congress, reflecting the change in the political climate and the automakers’ shaky financial condition.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Front Page News
KEYWORDS: agenda; automakers; bho44; bhoenergy; bhoenvironment; cafe; second100days
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last
I'm disappointed by the automakers' endorsement of the industry's suicide, but the TARP money did not come for free. They won't pay be able to it back, but they will toe the line. A big gas tax to push prices to $4/gallon and force people to buy the small cars Obama wants for them may be coming in a few years -- unless we evict these bums.
1 posted on 05/19/2009 11:30:26 AM PDT by reaganaut1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: steelyourfaith; xcamel

ping


2 posted on 05/19/2009 11:30:58 AM PDT by reaganaut1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

WTH is he to arbitrarily set rates or fire CEOs anyway? What happened to by the people and for the people?


3 posted on 05/19/2009 11:32:47 AM PDT by BipolarBob (It takes a Kenyan village to raise a US president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Next thing you know the feds will have to restrict family size, because you can only fit so many people in subcompact cars.


4 posted on 05/19/2009 11:33:27 AM PDT by keats5 (Not all of us are hypnotized.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
Environmental advocates and industry officials welcomed the new program, an accord that Mr. Obama said “would have been considered impossible” in the past.
It would have been impossible before the Government owned the auto industry.
5 posted on 05/19/2009 11:35:16 AM PDT by 5thGenTexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Will Hussein’s little putt-putts haul a cord of firewood up my hill to my thousand-foot elevation property?

I think not.


6 posted on 05/19/2009 11:35:38 AM PDT by EggsAckley ("There's an Ethiopian in the fuel supply." W.C Fields)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BipolarBob
We'll just spell it "Peaple's Car" instead of "Volkswagon"

The luxury model will be the "USA" .. cue old Doris Day Chevy jingle .....

7 posted on 05/19/2009 11:35:39 AM PDT by knarf (I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

EXCELLENT.

Froggie like wasser, wasser all nice and warm.....

And when gastax revenues drop due to alternates and higher efficiencies, bang, mileage fees, MA is going to put a sales tax on gas, or rather, remove the exemption, lol.

SWEET!


8 posted on 05/19/2009 11:35:43 AM PDT by swarthyguy ("We may be crazy in Pakistan, but not completely out of our minds," ISI Gen. Ahmed Shujaa Pasha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BipolarBob

Will this help Chrysler and GM return to profitability? Even if you think this is a good idea, couldn’t they delay for some years to let them get back on their feet? Here they are going to have to re-tool and absorb lots of new costs and pass along price increases at a point where they are financially weak.


9 posted on 05/19/2009 11:36:16 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

too many posts on this one today...


10 posted on 05/19/2009 11:36:39 AM PDT by xcamel (The urge to save humanity is always a false front for the urge to rule it. - H. L. Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
This is red meat for the Obowma's leftist base.

They were deserting him last week with his torture shenanigans.

That's why this socialist announcement now, IMHO.

11 posted on 05/19/2009 11:37:01 AM PDT by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1; All
Say if we can make CAFE standards of 35.5mpg by executive fiat, why not 135.5mpg? Why even stop there. We can just issue an executative order that Cancer and AIDS will be cured by 2016. Why Not?

This is madness, plain and simple. There are already plenty of vehicles out there that get over 35mpg (highway). All people have to do is buy them.

Just when you think this man cannot get any more foolish, he outdoes himself. If anyone here voted for this fool, shame on you.
12 posted on 05/19/2009 11:37:30 AM PDT by truthguy (Good intentions are not enough!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knarf

It wasn’t Doris Day. It was Dinah Shore.

Just trivia that an aging useless eater such as myself remembers........

~</;o)


13 posted on 05/19/2009 11:37:34 AM PDT by EggsAckley ("There's an Ethiopian in the fuel supply." W.C Fields)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
The rules, which will begin to take effect in 2012, will put in place a federal standard for fuel efficiency that is as tough as the California program,...

We all know how well California is doing via government dictate don't we.

14 posted on 05/19/2009 11:37:46 AM PDT by EGPWS (Trust in God, Question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
Didn't all the previous CAFE standards have to go through Congress? How does Obama just clap his hands together and say "So let it be written, so let it be done"?
15 posted on 05/19/2009 11:37:59 AM PDT by KarlInOhio (No free man bows to a foreign king.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Socialist translation: We are imposing more regulations on the serfs in order to eliminate more of their freedoms with the goal of replacing the Democratic Republic with socialism.


16 posted on 05/19/2009 11:38:14 AM PDT by Man50D (Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

This has nothing to do with bringing Chrysler or GM back to profitability. This has to do with crippling that thorn in the side FORD who refuses to roll over and die like the rest.


17 posted on 05/19/2009 11:38:35 AM PDT by BipolarBob (It takes a Kenyan village to raise a US president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: BipolarBob
What happened to by the people and for the people?

It was lost in translation via "public education".

18 posted on 05/19/2009 11:41:40 AM PDT by EGPWS (Trust in God, Question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

We need to vote the bums out. 4 years of hell will be bad enough.


19 posted on 05/19/2009 11:42:49 AM PDT by b4its2late (There is always one more imbecile than you counted on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EggsAckley
As soon as I hit 'enter' I realized that ... See the USA
20 posted on 05/19/2009 11:43:41 AM PDT by knarf (I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson