Posted on 05/15/2009 11:05:01 AM PDT by SJackson
(CNN) -- House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is engaging in a "despicable, dishonest and vicious political effort" to withhold what she knew about the CIA's harsh interrogation techniques, former Speaker Newt Gingrich said Friday.
Newt Gingrich says Nancy Pelosi is a 'trivial politician, viciously using partisanship for the narrowest of purposes.'
1 of 2 Gingrich said Pelosi "lied to the House" when she earlier claimed that the CIA had never briefed her about the Bush administration's use of interrogation methods like waterboarding, which is considered torture by the current administration.
"I think that the House has an absolute obligation to open an inquiry, and I hope there will be a resolution to investigate her. And I think this is a big deal. I don't think the speaker of the House can lie to the country on national security matters," the Republican leader said in an interview with ABC Radio.
Pelosi has been under fire from critics who say she was fully briefed on the techniques in 2002 and 2003. On Thursday, the California Democrat accused CIA officials of misleading her, reiterating a claim that she was briefed on such techniques only once -- in September 2002 -- and that she was told at the time that the techniques were not being used.
(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...
I see that pic and think ... it’s a DUMMY DEMMY DHIMMI.
I have a SIMPLE FIX for all those fixated on Newt years-old issues rather than the real matter of hand, our CURRENT lying Speaker of the House....
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is engaging in a “despicable, dishonest and vicious political effort” to withhold what she knew about the CIA’s harsh interrogation techniques, Governor Sarah Palin said Friday.
Sarah Palin says Nancy Pelosi is a ‘trivial politician, viciously using partisanship for the narrowest of purposes.’
Palin said Pelosi “lied to the House” when she earlier claimed that the CIA had never briefed her about the Bush administration’s use of interrogation methods like waterboarding, which is considered torture by the current administration.
“I think that the House has an absolute obligation to open an inquiry, and I hope there will be a resolution to investigate her. And I think this is a big deal. I don’t think the speaker of the House can lie to the country on national security matters,” the Republican leader said in an interview with ABC Radio.
“I can’t think of many politicians that I would trust more. “
Newt is the ‘jumbo shrimp’ of honest politicians.
All those bent out of shape over Newt Gingrich stating the obvious, please look at my previous post.
http://travismonitor.blogspot.com/index.html
“Your mistrust is what is wrong with the conservative movement. Any real or imagined blemish or lack of Christ like perfection is reason for throwing a leader to the wolves.”
Absolutely correct.
http://travismonitor.blogspot.com/2009/05/no-need-for-heros.html
If we search for heroes and saints amongst politicians, we will search in vain. For in fact, democratic politicians are who they are because of the people themselves:
Men of principle get swept away in elections for holding unpopular positions.
Men of integrity lose to those dishonest flatterers of public passions.
Men of high intelligence are seen as out-of-touch with the people, while true patriots plucked from the people may be good public servants but lesser politicians, lacking the artful skills of the professional politicians.
Men who are citizens first and politicians second lack the time, ambition and sponsors to compete in the rough arena of democratic politics.
Thus in all respects, those who might serve us as heroes and saints would are harried and constrained from doing so. And its the people themselves who are to blame. Yet they cannot do it any other way. It’s not easy to discern between a panderer and a listener; a man of ideas and a mere plagiarizer of them; a patriot and a
We make things worse when we grade ‘our’ politicians against the standards of the impossible hero - the man whose charisma will overwhelm opponents, disarm critics and manage to speak out for *exactly what we want* (never mind what the diversity of other people want). We curse those who do our bidding, imperfectly (as humans do), while demanding the impossible. Most politicians are just a faint reflection of who we really need to lead us, because most voters put less care in the serious selection than buying a cereal box.
The best we can expect out of a politician is honesty and attention to the needs of his constituents while maintaining some modicum of consistency built on a foundation of principles. The best we can expect is some competency in articulation, enough to let people know where he stands and why, enough to convince those fence-sitters and serve notice to opponents that he might bend but he wont break. The best we can do as voters is make sure that the candidates satisfy sufficiently in the areas of character, competence, and vision so that we wont be disappointed down the road.
We don’t need heroes. Just public servants. It’s up to us as voters to stop sending the best of breed to the showers.
Amen.....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.