I don’t think so. To me you seem to be vested on one side of this. You are attacking someone over an overstatement, I don’t see dishonesty but whatever.
I'm not. What I am "vested on," is honest discussion, of which this sadly typical WND piece is not an example.
You are attacking someone over an overstatement, I don’t see dishonesty but whatever.
The fact is that the APA says nothing close to what Mr. Unruh claims it said. His "overstatement" is deliberate and false. He is dishonest.