Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ClearCase_guy; tacticalogic
To a certain extent, if the animal is found not to be quite so old, then it becomes difficult to make the case that the rocks are so very old.

Maybe the T. Rex just had very sharp claws and was able to dig into the rock, and then meticulous replace the rock back into place in such a way as to give the appearance of the rock never having been disturbed?

Either way, we KNOW that the T. Rex is billions and billions of years old, since that's what Richard Dawkins said.

9 posted on 05/12/2009 7:51:22 PM PDT by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus (Spock didn't need a teleprompter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus

“Either way, we KNOW that the T. Rex is billions and billions of years old, since that’s what Richard Dawkins said.”

And little Dickie Dawkins is never wrong, is he?

All good points... well placed sarcasm.


35 posted on 05/12/2009 8:18:12 PM PDT by Gordon Greene (www.fracturedrepublic.com - Jesus said, "I am THE way, THE truth and THE life." Any questions?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson