The memo is linked in Post#4. The WH attempt to refute its importance is linked in Post#8.
SideBar Moderator: this issue has NOT been “debunked” - it simply has been refuted by WH damage control attempts. After reading this memo, I believe that it is a very illustrative, despite the denials of the WH/EPA here, and I think the title should be changed back to the original, without “debunked”