Actually, I did not do that. I compared a particular conversation I was having with you to one I might have with a mentally disabled person. In this case, you had the EXACT same simple concept explained to you three or four times, and you flat-out refused to accept the truth, as it was explained to you. That is not, repeat not, the same thing as calling you retarded. Perhaps you are having a problem identifying similies for what they are. I guess that's you're problem not mine. FWIW, I recognize that you have the mental capacity to log on to the internet and create a FR account. It seems to me that you function in the neighborhood of the average level.
That being said, we'll return to figures of speech, and your previous post: For instanstance, I’m assuming that you’re not bright enough to know that “beyond the pale” is a direct anti-Catholic referrence. As far as I’m concerned, you happened to use it on this thread accidently. If a couple of other people on this thread had used it, I'd have to assume that its use was intentional, fully cognizant, and hostile. Not with you, though sweetheart. Which would you prefer?
Yawn.
This isn’t the first time you’ve made comments about my intelligence and ability to reason. I think YOU have that problem, not me. You just keep rambling on and on. Get a job.