[2ndDivisionVet]

Get used to it: It'll be here before you know it.

[Nosterrex]

It makes perfect sense to me. If marriage is no longer defined as a heterosexual union, what then constitutes marriage? Who defines it? If all you need for a marriage is committed individuals, why not polygamy or polyamory? According to the state constitutions, is marriage not a matter of equal rights? It seems to me that if one follows logical conclusions, the law would have to allow anyone without qualifications from marrying whatever and as many as he/she/it wants. Of course the law is not based upon logic or common sense, so I have no idea what the courts will decide. I guess it depends upon how the judge feels on a certain day.

[headstamp 2]

EVERYBODY POLKA!

[M. Espinola]

When will dogs be able to marry cats?

[DemforBush]

Well, maybe in a few years I’ll finally be able to make an honest woman out of my gal...

Inflatable woman
You’re the gal for me
Inflatable woman
You are so sexy

Hide her inside my closet door
She’s the rubber doll that I adore
She’s got artificial tonsils too
She’s got two fine vinyl eyes of blue

Now woman
Don’t deflate
Inflatable woman
Patch you with duct tape

Inflatable woman
You’re the gal for me
Inflatable woman
You are so sexy

Sprung a leak at a real bad time
My frat brothers found you - they know you’re mine!

Miller Lite cans hid your eyes
‘Til they found you by surprise

Now woman
They stole you!
Inflatable woman
Where did they take you-hoo?

Inflatable woman
You were so grand
Inflatable woman
Now I use my h-, uh never mind...

[Texas resident]

All right. Listen up. Here’s the solution. Let all the polygmasts and whatever they are all marry each other. Sooner of later, a divorce will come up. OK in this corner we have 35,000 plaintiffs against 23,000 defendants. Would tie up all the lawyers and courts up for ever and all these idiots would be broke paying retainers. And what about the animal rights and plant rights? How about the space alien rights. Make into a reality show with live ammo and I would watch.

[Tired of Taxes]

About ten years ago, I was posting on a message forum for women, and one woman introduced herself to us as “bisexual polyamory”. She said she had a husband and a girlfriend, and they all lived together with her and her husband’s sons. She claimed back then that being “polyamory” was the same as being “homosexual” in that she was “born that way.” (FTR, no, I myself don’t believe anyone is born either way.)

She also claimed that we all were repressed because each of us was married to one man. And she claimed that not allowing their threesome to marry was “discrimination”. We would argue with her and point out why polygamy was wrong. But, most worrisome was that she said she and her husband produced adult films. She also said sometimes the sons would curl up with her and her girlfriend. When we asked if her children were even involved in pornography, she kept vague and said, “Define pornography.” We didn’t know who the woman was, but we all were worried about those children.

That was ten years ago. And even back then there were a few articles in the MSM about polyamory couples. I remember thinking then that, after “homosexuality”, polyamory would be the next step down.