So then what does this part of his quote mean..
“What is not so clear, however, is whether microevolution is totally decoupled from macroevolution. The two can more probably be seen as a continuum with a notable overlap.”
He plainly states that to two are continuous with notable overlapping, that my friend is far from your assertion that they are not realted. In fact they are one and the same.
No amount of slight of hand will fool anybody that you did not take that quote out of context.
Also take a look at post #30.
[[The two can more probably be seen as a continuum with a notable overlap]]
Assumption and projection/extrapolation- they just dismissed the possibility Macroevolution can be extrapolated from Microevolution, then they, in their undying devotion to a religious ideology, turn right around and make a glaring assumption
[[He plainly states that to two are continuous with notable overlapping,]]
NO Sir! He says ‘probably’, and ‘it’s not so clear’- Again, he leaps from the EVIDENCE to an assumption
[[No amount of slight of hand will fool anybody that you did not take that quote out of context.]]
Tis not I sir that is trying to peddle ASSUMPTIONS as fact/evidence-
Happy Mother’s Day!