Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ira_Louvin

[[The two can more probably be seen as a continuum with a notable overlap]]

Assumption and projection/extrapolation- they just dismissed the possibility Macroevolution can be extrapolated from Microevolution, then they, in their undying devotion to a religious ideology, turn right around and make a glaring assumption

[[He plainly states that to two are continuous with notable overlapping,]]

NO Sir! He says ‘probably’, and ‘it’s not so clear’- Again, he leaps from the EVIDENCE to an assumption

[[No amount of slight of hand will fool anybody that you did not take that quote out of context.]]

Tis not I sir that is trying to peddle ASSUMPTIONS as fact/evidence-

Happy Mother’s Day!


148 posted on 05/10/2009 2:13:48 PM PDT by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies ]


To: CottShop

I was born at night but it was not last night.

I do have basic reading comprehension and I know what Roger Lewin is saying

Just face it you were busted using a quote mine that you thought I would not know.

You are only making it worse; we both know that all science is based on assumptions. You can never prove a scientific theory you can only disprove it.

Nice try.


155 posted on 05/10/2009 5:17:42 PM PDT by Ira_Louvin (Go tell them people lost in sin, They need not fear the works of men.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson