[[The two can more probably be seen as a continuum with a notable overlap]]
Assumption and projection/extrapolation- they just dismissed the possibility Macroevolution can be extrapolated from Microevolution, then they, in their undying devotion to a religious ideology, turn right around and make a glaring assumption
[[He plainly states that to two are continuous with notable overlapping,]]
NO Sir! He says ‘probably’, and ‘it’s not so clear’- Again, he leaps from the EVIDENCE to an assumption
[[No amount of slight of hand will fool anybody that you did not take that quote out of context.]]
Tis not I sir that is trying to peddle ASSUMPTIONS as fact/evidence-
Happy Mother’s Day!
I was born at night but it was not last night.
I do have basic reading comprehension and I know what Roger Lewin is saying
Just face it you were busted using a quote mine that you thought I would not know.
You are only making it worse; we both know that all science is based on assumptions. You can never prove a scientific theory you can only disprove it.
Nice try.