Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: InterceptPoint
It is convoluted but it is also "the law".

It may be "the law", but it is also illegal, i.e. in violation of the Constitution - of which Montana apparently has a few well-thumbed copies.

Any tyrant can enact a law. Whether it'll stand enforcement is another question.
88 posted on 05/05/2009 12:39:18 PM PDT by LearsFool ("Thou shouldst not have been old, till thou hadst been wise.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]


To: LearsFool

It’s stood up for almost 70 years, unfortunately.


90 posted on 05/05/2009 12:42:09 PM PDT by Straight Vermonter (Posting from deep behind the Maple Curtain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies ]

To: LearsFool

I’m with you. The idea that Wickard v Filburn has any bearing on this case assumes that the Supreme Court is the highest law of the land. That IS the leftists/statists’ assumption, but it doesn’t have to be ours.

The state legislature simply has to say that federal laws will not be enforced in this manner, then back it up with countering any attempt to use force to enforce those laws with local law enforcement arresting the fed enforcement agents.


103 posted on 05/05/2009 12:51:02 PM PDT by MrB (Go Galt now, Bowman later)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson