To: Still Thinking
You may be correct. As I wrote to someone else Clarence Thomas, in his dissent to Gonzales v. Raich, seems willing to dramatically limit the congress’ power to use the commerce clause.
134 posted on
05/05/2009 1:10:10 PM PDT by
Straight Vermonter
(Posting from deep behind the Maple Curtain)
To: Straight Vermonter
I’ve always secretly wanted to replace everybody from Scalia to Stevens with eight Thomas clones.
135 posted on
05/05/2009 1:11:19 PM PDT by
Still Thinking
(Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
To: Straight Vermonter
As I wrote to someone else Clarence Thomas, in his dissent to Gonzales v. Raich, seems willing to dramatically limit the congress power to use the commerce clause.He did, but he couldn't get Scalia to go along with him. (His dissent was joined only by Rehnquist and O'Connor, neither of whom is on the Court anymore).
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson