1 posted on
04/30/2009 7:07:20 PM PDT by
RDTF
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-109 next last
To: RDTF
A huge mistake by the elder Bush. Souter is the result when politics trumps competence
To: RDTF
How, pray tell, is it that 7 of the current 9 Supreme Court Justices were nominated by Republican Presidents, yet routinely the votes come out 5-4?
Need help with my maths.
42 posted on
04/30/2009 7:28:05 PM PDT by
adm5
(YOU CANNOT FIX CAPITALISM WITH SOCIALISM! -Glenn Beck)
To: RDTF
Ruh-Roh Well, he has destroyed everything else...now he will destroy the third leg.
We no longer live in the USA boys.....we have just entered the twilight zone.....
Better figure a way of getting this guy impeached and quick or else....
43 posted on
04/30/2009 7:28:15 PM PDT by
blasater1960
( Dt 30, Ps 111, The Torah is perfect, attainable, now and forever)
To: RDTF
Paging Ron Kuby.
Paging Jackie Chiles.
44 posted on
04/30/2009 7:28:15 PM PDT by
P.O.E.
To: RDTF
Hillary to SCOTUS?
Kicking her upstairs and out of the way would be convenient for a lot of people.
47 posted on
04/30/2009 7:29:59 PM PDT by
Ken H
To: RDTF
First name comes to mind as replacement is Arlen Spector. Bama would not then be obligated to campaign for him.
49 posted on
04/30/2009 7:31:06 PM PDT by
Just mythoughts
(Bama and Company are reenacting the Pharaoh as told by Moses in Genesis!!!!!)
To: RDTF
He is not that old, right? Hasn’t been sick.....Why retiring?
50 posted on
04/30/2009 7:31:20 PM PDT by
La Enchiladita
(Don't worry, be hope-y.)
To: RDTF
Question.
Suppose Obama does appoint 2 or 3 Supreme Court justices and then it is found that he wasn’t eligible to be President. Does that kick out any of his appointments?
54 posted on
04/30/2009 7:32:25 PM PDT by
BuffaloJack
(To stand up for Capitalism is to hope Teleprompter Boy fails.)
To: RDTF
Zero really can’t do any damage replacing Souter. How much worse could any appointment by that scumbag be?
To: RDTF
57 posted on
04/30/2009 7:34:03 PM PDT by
rdl6989
To: RDTF
Gee Louize probably with our luck Obama would pick Hillary CLinton as Supreme court justice
58 posted on
04/30/2009 7:34:03 PM PDT by
SevenofNine
("We are Freepers, all your media belong to us, resistence is futile")
To: RDTF
This is likely to be Obama’s first selection of what will probably be 2-3 total SCOTUS appointees before 2012.
To: RDTF
Let’s see if the republicans have the balls to bork the initial communist the clowns propose to fill the spot.
61 posted on
04/30/2009 7:37:02 PM PDT by
glock rocks
(You got a permit to carry that there virus, Senor Passing the Contageon that Americans won't?)
To: RDTF
So a Liberal Justice will replaced with an Ultra-Liberal Justice. I won’t worry, unless a Conservative Justice or Justice Kennedy is replaced.
63 posted on
04/30/2009 7:37:14 PM PDT by
Repeal 16-17
(Let me know when the Shooting starts.)
To: RDTF
Clinton reprise from ‘93. He had succeeded a Bush, had a dumocrat majority senate, and shoved Ruth Buzzy Ginsburg, radical feminist and former ACLU lawyer down our throats.
Whoever it is will be big on foreign law. Heck it might not even be an American. Sorry Arlen, it won’t be YOU now!
68 posted on
04/30/2009 7:40:14 PM PDT by
H.Akston
(I sure hope that sub-prime lending wasn't barney frank's covert economic stimulus plan.)
To: RDTF
Not to worry
Replacing a lib with another lib is not a crisis, just a trade.
If we lost a conservative judge, then we’d be screwed.
70 posted on
04/30/2009 7:41:09 PM PDT by
KosmicKitty
(WARNING: Hormonally crazed woman ahead!!)
“Ah nominates Flip Wilson”!!
71 posted on
04/30/2009 7:41:16 PM PDT by
clintonh8r
(Librerals are more dangerous to liberty than terrorists.)
To: RDTF
Now we remember why we loathe NH. It will be interesting to see if Obama can find anybody worse. I really doubt he can.
74 posted on
04/30/2009 7:42:47 PM PDT by
Theodore R.
(GWB is gone: Now the American sheeple can sleep at night!)
To: RDTF; Hurricane Andrew; FlingWingFlyer; Diana in Wisconsin; Anitius Severinus Boethius; guido911; ..
None of this matters so much. Look for a resurrection of the
Judiciary Reorganization Bill of 1937 to be buried in some 10,000 page long omnibus appropriations bill. Congress has the right to adjust the size of the SCOTUS, you know. No constitutional article or amendment has the size set at 9.
And if Harry "the body" Reid makes sure there is enough pork in the bill for Maine, I know that there will be at least two Repubicans that will gladly vote for it.
Just wait. They'll have us distracted with some stupid thing (mmm, maybe get our collective fury directed toward a "Truth Commission," "Congressional Hearings on Torture," "Special Prosecutor," or something like that) and they'll slip it in with no negative comment from the right at all.
Stay vigilant.
77 posted on
04/30/2009 7:44:35 PM PDT by
markomalley
(Extra Ecclesiam nulla salus)
To: RDTF
Perfect timing for the rat Specter.
79 posted on
04/30/2009 7:45:00 PM PDT by
armyofprinciples
(I dressed as 0bama for Halloween. I disguised myself as a Christian.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-109 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson