[tacticalogic]

The evidence however, is piling up. It’s easier to explain young earth and massive, punctuated sudden changes in the environment to produce the fossil beds than millions of years of slow change. Each side needs creative explanations for some observations, but they are far less outlandish on the relatively young earth side.

Explain to me how this piece of animal tissue is evidence of a young Earth.

[Yudan]

For such a repository of clear thinking, I sometimes simply don’t have the words for some of the utter NONSENSE that gets posted on this site.

Except to say,

Lord, have mercy.
Lord, have mercy.
Lord, have mercy.

[gscc]

“Explain to me how this piece of animal tissue is evidence of a young Earth.”

Maybe you can explain how they dated this piece of animal tissue at 80 million (give or take a few days) years old?

[BereanBrain]

let me introduce you to a little thing we call LOGIC.

1) If the 80 M yrs dating of the strata is right, that means that you MUST explain how you can get viable DNA from 80 M/yr old remains.

OR

2) the “dating” of 80 M years is wrong by a HUGE amount, in line with what has been shown to be the typical age of viable DNA - more like tens of thousands of years.

No other option...... Which do you prefer?

Usually at this point, the godless start talking about extraterrestrial involvement.....(like when they say life on earth probably came from astroids or visitors etc)