[BereanBrain]

let me introduce you to a little thing we call LOGIC.

1) If the 80 M yrs dating of the strata is right, that means that you MUST explain how you can get viable DNA from 80 M/yr old remains.

OR

2) the “dating” of 80 M years is wrong by a HUGE amount, in line with what has been shown to be the typical age of viable DNA - more like tens of thousands of years.

No other option...... Which do you prefer?

Usually at this point, the godless start talking about extraterrestrial involvement.....(like when they say life on earth probably came from astroids or visitors etc)

[tacticalogic]

Okay, try your logic on this. If they're off by a factor of 10,000 and this fossil is only actually 8,000 years old, and they use exactly the same method to date the Earth and it's off by the same amount then the Earth is still almost half a million years old.

If you want to apply that same logic to the problem of the age of the Earth, then it should be your responsibility to explain how to solve the thermodynmic problems of and explain how uranium decay can be accellerated 10,000 times faster than has ever been observed.

Are you willing to take that on, or do you just sit there and demand that everbody has to work?