Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Montana Fires Warning Shot Over States' Rights
Billings Gazette ^ | April 29, 2009 | AP

Posted on 04/29/2009 4:45:32 PM PDT by Harley

Montana is trying to trigger a battle over gun control - and perhaps make a larger point about what many folks in this ruggedly independent state regard as a meddlesome federal government.

In a bill passed by the Legislature earlier this month, the state is asserting that guns manufactured in Montana and sold in Montana to people who intend to keep their weapons in Montana are exempt from federal gun registration, background check and dealer-licensing rules because no state lines are crossed.

(Excerpt) Read more at billingsgazette.net ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: gunsstatesrights
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last
To: OneWingedShark

I’ll parse your arse! maybe. I better look up what “parse” means first.

I use the cell phone WHILE RIDING MY HARLEY. So stick that in your pipe and smoke it!


21 posted on 04/29/2009 5:29:26 PM PDT by mamelukesabre (Si Vis Pacem Para Bellum (If you want peace prepare for war))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: mamelukesabre

>I use the cell phone WHILE RIDING MY HARLEY. So stick that in your pipe and smoke it!

As long as I have the right, should you try to run me down, to shoot at you then go ahead.

>I’ll parse your arse! maybe. I better look up what “parse” means first.

LOL - That’s funny.

Parse:
1. to analyze (a sentence) in terms of grammatical constituents, identifying the parts of speech, syntactic relations, etc.
2. to describe (a word in a sentence) grammatically, identifying the part of speech, inflectional form, syntactic function, etc.
3. Computers. to analyze (a string of characters) in order to associate groups of characters with the syntactic units of the underlying grammar.


22 posted on 04/29/2009 5:34:15 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Harley

Without the interstate commerce clause giving the nanny state the fig leaf that enables it to rule from D. C., the federal government could not dictate gun control in the states. The Tenth Amendment was written for just such a situation.


23 posted on 04/29/2009 5:45:02 PM PDT by kittymyrib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lucian
Alaska is at the top of the Federal "recipient states" list because it has big military facilities and enormous tracts of Federal land in comparison to the population.

Montana is close to the top of this list because of the huge Indian reservations in the state. This is probably the same reason why New Mexico is up there, too.

24 posted on 04/29/2009 5:52:05 PM PDT by Alberta's Child (I'm out on the outskirts of nowhere . . . with ghosts on my trail, chasing me there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: OneWingedShark

aw, wassa matta, girly man? You afraid a big scary harley will run over your SUV?


25 posted on 04/29/2009 5:56:16 PM PDT by mamelukesabre (Si Vis Pacem Para Bellum (If you want peace prepare for war))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Harley

bump


26 posted on 04/29/2009 6:03:36 PM PDT by gibsosa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Harley; All

Does Montana have a state income tax?


27 posted on 04/29/2009 6:06:54 PM PDT by PeteePie (Antique firearms - still deadly after all these years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mamelukesabre

>aw, wassa matta, girly man?

What makes you think I’m a girly-man?

>You afraid a big scary harley will run over your SUV?

Actually, I drive a 1962 Chevy truck...


28 posted on 04/29/2009 7:51:58 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Harley
Montana Fires Warning Shot Over States' Rights


29 posted on 04/29/2009 7:53:36 PM PDT by dfwgator (1996 2006 2008 - Good Things Come in Threes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OneWingedShark

why do harleys scare you? They can’t hurt you inside your truck. I don’t think you’re a girly man. I just wanted to get your attention and rile you up a little.

If a harley rider is on a cell phone and bounces off your grill, or goes under your tires, what do you care?


30 posted on 04/29/2009 7:59:01 PM PDT by mamelukesabre (Si Vis Pacem Para Bellum (If you want peace prepare for war))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: mamelukesabre

>If a harley rider is on a cell phone and bounces off your grill, or goes under your tires, what do you care?

It’s not like I don’t walk... even a motor-cycle hitting a pedestrian isn’t going to end well.

>why do harleys scare you?

They don’t. It’s more an issue of cell-phone usage... if someone is about to run you down while talking on a cell-phone, I think that qualifies as assault and should be dealt with accordingly.

“I didn’t see him.” is a poor excuse when talking on the cell because the observational-powers of the driver are reduced thereby. The reduction in awareness is sometimes so great that, should any “accident” happen, the driver could/should be charged with criminal negligence.


31 posted on 04/29/2009 8:17:53 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: OneWingedShark

“i didn’t see him” is a poor excuse when NOT talking on a cell phone.


32 posted on 04/29/2009 8:30:45 PM PDT by mamelukesabre (Si Vis Pacem Para Bellum (If you want peace prepare for war))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Lucian
However the state average for gun ownership is 27 per household (family of four).

I've got that covered (and a few to spare...) and it's just me and my wife and a big fuzzy cat!

Regards,
GtG

33 posted on 04/29/2009 8:35:32 PM PDT by Gandalf_The_Gray (I live in my own little world, I like it 'cuz they know me here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: OneWingedShark
That "Hate Crimes" bill they're trying to get passed is another example.

Unintended consequences can be a bitch.

34 posted on 04/30/2009 4:43:26 AM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Harley
What the Constitution says is that they may "regulate commerce among the several Several States." If an item does not move "in commerce", then it may not be regulated. It's already private property and therefore outside the scope.

When the Supreme court ruled (sorry I don't have the case) that a farmer who feeds his stock his own home grown feed corn is "effecting interstate commerce" and can therefore be regulated, then this provision has morphed into absolute power.

Let's hope the current Court can put the Federal Genie back into its bottle.

35 posted on 04/30/2009 10:26:07 AM PDT by nonsporting
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeteePie

Income tax = yes
Sales tax = no


36 posted on 04/30/2009 9:17:23 PM PDT by Lucian (I am, therefore, I'll think)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson