To: Pharmboy
I’m a native American. I was born and raised in this country.
4 posted on
04/29/2009 6:16:01 AM PDT by
Man50D
(Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it!)
To: Man50D
That’s THEIR headline...check the key words.
7 posted on
04/29/2009 6:17:39 AM PDT by
Pharmboy
(Who ever thought we would long for the days of the Clinton administration...)
To: Man50D
I lived and worked for ten years in northern Canada among both Inuit and Native people, and it seems to me the Inuit and the Cree/Athapaskan people looked very different. Their cultures were very different indeed. What do you think?
Also I have read that the Algonkian peoples have a high incidence of the genome X as opposed to other groups in North American.
This is from Oppenheimer.
Interested in your opinion, thanks.
To: Man50D
Im a native American. I was born and raised in this country.
Me, too.
That does bring up an interesting discussion point, however. Should the populations discovered here and named Indian by European explorers be called something else since they are obviously not from India?
Besides the overly broad term, Native American (which, as you have noted, applies to you and me as well as the group so designated by the PC crowd), I have seen AmerInd and several others. Perhaps, they would be more correctly identified as Aboriginal Americans. What do you think?
To: Man50D
Im a native American. I was born and raised in this country.Same here.
Sometimes I check the little Native American box just to annoy the HR people.
37 posted on
04/29/2009 7:22:05 AM PDT by
OpeEdMunkey
(We seem to have reached a critical mass of stupid people.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson