Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Man50D
I’m a native American. I was born and raised in this country.

Me, too.

That does bring up an interesting discussion point, however. Should the populations discovered here and named Indian by European explorers be called something else since they are obviously not from India?

Besides the overly broad term, Native American (which, as you have noted, applies to you and me as well as the group so designated by the PC crowd), I have seen AmerInd and several others. Perhaps, they would be more correctly identified as Aboriginal Americans. What do you think?
18 posted on 04/29/2009 6:33:38 AM PDT by Lucky Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Lucky Dog
I would have to go with *aboriginal* or *indigenous)
84 posted on 04/29/2009 12:06:23 PM PDT by wolfcreek ("unnamed "right-wing extremist")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: Lucky Dog; Pharmboy

I vote you call me an Amerind. Native American.Or call us by tribes. Works for me. Just don’t call me late for supper.


103 posted on 04/29/2009 5:57:04 PM PDT by Redcitizen (December 21, 2012; there's change for ya!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson