Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bill Would Require You to Identify Yourself At All Times[TX]
WOAI ^ | 16 Apr 2009 | Jim Forsyth

Posted on 04/20/2009 7:53:50 AM PDT by BGHater

Any 'peace officer' can demand i.d. any time, doesn't say exactly who qualifies as a 'peace officer.'

Papers please!!

The Texas Senate has approved a bizarre measure which would require citizens to show some sort of identification to any police officer who demands it, at any time, for any reason, 1200 WOAI news reports.

Currently, it is illegal for a person to give a false name to police, but there is no law rewiring a person to provide i.d. at an officer's whim. And State Sen. Tommy Williams (R-The Woodlands) doesn't like the sound of this bill.

"We still live in a free society," he said. "I don't want police officers to be able to pull you over and ask that you identify yourself."

The bill would also require individuals to provide their date of birth and 'residence address' to police.

Supporters of the bill, like State Sen. Juan Hinojosa (D-McAllen) says there are safeguards.

"A police officer would not have the discretion just to come over and ask for i.d. on just anybody," he said.

Hinojosa said the officer would have to have a 'good reason' to demand identification.

The bill is sponsored by State Sen. Dan Patrick (R-Houston), who is a strong supporter of individual rights.

"It is illegal for them to falsely identify themselves, but it is not illegal for them not to tell you who they are," Patrick said. "In this era of national security issues, if we have a police officer detaining someone at a high profile target, it is in the best interests of the safety of that officer and this community to be able to quickly determine who that person is."

Other lawmakers say if a person is bent on committing a crime, the individual is not likely to be deterred by the possibility of a misdemeanor charge of failure to identify.

Patrick’s' bill does not specify exactly who a 'peace officer' who is authorized to demand papers is. It doesn't say whether it would be limited to TCLOSE certified police officers, or would apply to constables, security guards, or neighborhood watch members. It also doesn't specify what passes for 'i.d' and wither it would have to be a photo i.d.

The bill also does not spell out any safeguards or recource for citizens who are asked at random to identify themselves to police.


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: danpatrick; donttreadonme; freedom; gestappo; id; identification; ksev; lping; papersplease; police; rapeofliberty; rights; talkradio; texas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-135 next last
To: Stat-boy
Justified or not, I do.

Being forced, on pain of punishment, to do anything at all under such circumstances has opened a crack through which all manner of abuse has found a way into our legal system.

"Asset forfeiture" was one such proposal. After all, who could argue with taking property away from those who gained from criminal action. That held water until the first few cases where that bar was lowered to a point where folks buying cars/houses with cash down payments were getting rolled by law enforcement.

Law Enforcement is no longer our Friend. The game is to find something to pin on your target, it isn't about mere "enforcement" any more. No need to make it easier for them to turn nothing into something.

81 posted on 04/20/2009 10:25:24 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (1000110010101010100001001001111)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse

I understand your concerns. We disagree on this point; but I do understand where you come from.

“Law Enforcement is no longer our Friend.”

I am sorry you feel this way, but this is also something I can understand. I do not have that feeling in the community where I live.


82 posted on 04/20/2009 10:27:55 AM PDT by Stat-boy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: numberonepal

Why should WE have to show ID, if Obama doesn’t even have to show a Birth Certificate???


83 posted on 04/20/2009 10:28:03 AM PDT by 2harddrive (...House a TOTAL Loss.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Stat-boy
Do not talk to the police.

This was re-iterated and illustrated by the retired officer that taught my Carry Permit course. My Father is former LEO as well and has said similar things although times were a bit different when he was still patrolling our County.

I haven't heard anything bad about our local LEO's. In jurisdictions around ours, there are some trouble spots. Nor have I ever had a bad run in with an officer. I have exactly on speeding ticket on my record and that was a fair stop by a Travis County Deputy. The officer at the time was very courteous and professional.

However, politics being what they are, the times being what they are, ANY expansion of the Laws power should be looked at with a VERY careful eye. Things like this can and are very easily twisted from their original purpose.

84 posted on 04/20/2009 10:36:59 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (1000110010101010100001001001111)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: BGHater; Eaker; Stat-boy
The bill is sponsored by State Sen. Dan Patrick (R-Houston), who is a strong supporter of individual rights.

How is it that Dan Patrick is claimed to sponsor this bill, but at the Texas Senate Website, he has sponsored or Co-sponsored NO bills?

http://www.capitol.state.tx.us/reports/report.aspx?LegSess=81R&ID=cosponsor&Code=A1430

http://www.capitol.state.tx.us/reports/report.aspx?LegSess=81R&ID=sponsor&Code=A1430

http://www.capitol.state.tx.us/Members/MemberInfo.aspx?Leg=81&Chamber=S&Code=A1430

85 posted on 04/20/2009 10:38:41 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: metmom; Abathar; Abcdefg; Abram; Abundy; akatel; albertp; AlexandriaDuke; Alexander Rubin; ...



Libertarian ping! Click here to get added or here to be removed or post a message here!
86 posted on 04/20/2009 10:39:18 AM PDT by bamahead (Few men desire liberty; most men wish only for a just master. -- Sallust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Dunno. I simply posted the article.

If your talking about Gov’t updating a website with Senate information your gonna always have problems.


87 posted on 04/20/2009 10:41:25 AM PDT by BGHater (Tyranny is always better organised than freedom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: BGHater
Doesn't bother me a bit. - I do not allow anyone in my family to leave home without some ID, and that includes my minor children.

I would also like to see a birth cert for Hussein

88 posted on 04/20/2009 10:46:00 AM PDT by bill1952 (Power is an illusion created between those with power - and those without)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

I see the problem.

He is not a sponsor, he is the author of the darn bill.

http://www.capitol.state.tx.us/BillLookup/History.aspx?LegSess=81R&Bill=SB01175


89 posted on 04/20/2009 10:47:24 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

>Doesn’t the 5th amendment give every person the right to remain silent?

Only after you are in custody and/or charged with a crime.
Until that they can demand some id.


90 posted on 04/20/2009 10:47:49 AM PDT by bill1952 (Power is an illusion created between those with power - and those without)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse

BTTT


91 posted on 04/20/2009 10:48:25 AM PDT by EdReform (The right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed *NRA*JPFO*SAF*GOA*SAS*CCRKBA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: John123

See, there is the trouble. Citizens. I believe the bill has good intentions and is trying to target illegals, but it’s missing the point. There does need to be something in regards to illegals. It’s called deportation. There is already legislation for it, go figure.


92 posted on 04/20/2009 10:49:33 AM PDT by Peanut Gallery (The essence of freedom is the proper limitation of government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: fella

Have you been waiting all day to say “straw man”?

If so find out the meaning first. I made an analogy.


93 posted on 04/20/2009 10:51:05 AM PDT by Eaker (The Two Loudest Sounds in the World.....Bang When it should have been Click and the Reverse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: BGHater
It also doesn't specify what passes for 'i.d' and wither it would have to be a photo i.d.

I can just see someone presenting a hand scribbled note saying:

"This is my son. I have identified him.

Signed,
His mother"

94 posted on 04/20/2009 10:51:05 AM PDT by varon (Allegiance to the constitution, always. Allegiance to a political party, never.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bill1952
On point of contact with law enforcement, you don't have to say squat.

This is looking to change that. Saying nothing, having nothing to hide, will now be a crime.

You sure that's where you want to take this Country?

95 posted on 04/20/2009 10:52:03 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (1000110010101010100001001001111)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Very good question.


96 posted on 04/20/2009 10:52:27 AM PDT by Eaker (The Two Loudest Sounds in the World.....Bang When it should have been Click and the Reverse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: mysterio
It's time people stopped repeating this slogan, because it's not true. We live in one of the most legislated societies on the planet.

Without a doubt.



97 posted on 04/20/2009 10:53:53 AM PDT by zeugma (Will it be nukes or aliens? Time will tell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Eaker

Found the answer, he is the author, not sponsor.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2233397/posts?page=89#89

But if I understand this correctly, it would only be an offense to fail to provide Name, residence and date of birth AFTER arrested or detained.


98 posted on 04/20/2009 10:55:22 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

The fight over illegals continues to threaten our freedom.


99 posted on 04/20/2009 10:55:40 AM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

Why not pass a National My Name Is tag law?


100 posted on 04/20/2009 11:03:22 AM PDT by 1010RD (First Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-135 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson