[puroresu]

It was inevitable that this would happen once our nation started getting more internally diverse. Liberals (and for that matter, most mainstream conservatives) have argued for fifty years that it doesn't make any difference what the demographics are in a nation. As if history provides any example of that being true. They act as if Japan could become 30% Japanese, 20% French, 20% Pakistani Muslim, 10% Jewish, and 20% Zulu and everything there would continue on as if nothing had changed.

We're then confronted with a parasite ideology, liberalism, which sponges off the constructive and productive elements of society, and uses the aforementioned internal diversity as a battering ram to get what it demands. Add in the arrival of feminism, secularism, and homosexualism, and you've got the makings of balkanization. There is no possibility of conservatism surviving in a very diverse society. It can't survive because conservatism by its very nature seeks to conserve what existed before the diversity occurred, while the diverse elements by their very nature are at war with those things. In addition, all these diverse elements feed off of the accumulated capital of conservatives, both by stealing our tax dollars and hijacking our constitutional order (as feminists and homosexuals have done). As diversity increases, conservatism must recede or depart.

[EQAndyBuzz]

What will happen to the arms manufacturers in Connectictut?

[EBH]

I am not as sure as you that “diversity” is really the issue as is the teaching of a treasonous ideology that has been taught and allowed to fester in our country.

What is the treasonous ideology? That teaching is against our Constitution. Tolerance of Free Speech vs. Tolerance of Treasonous Speech

[chimera]

In addition, all these diverse elements feed off of the accumulated capital of conservatives, both by stealing our tax dollars and hijacking our constitutional order (as feminists and homosexuals have done).

But at some point it consumes itself. Have we reached that tipping point? We can learn a little from nature here. In the natural world, for a population more or less in balance, the ratio of predators to prey is about 3%. If the $hit starts hitting the fan, you see that go up. When it reaches about 10-15%, you start seeing mass extinctions because the replenishment rate of the food supply can't offset the depletion.

Now, if we think of the mooching class in this country as "predators" of the productive class, what is the ratio? Getting close to 50%, I've heard. I think that tells us something.

[editor-surveyor]

"We're then confronted with a parasite ideology, liberalism..."

STATISM is the correct word.