Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Obama will never show his vault birth certificate.
The Greater Evil ^ | 04/13/09 | Polarik

Posted on 04/13/2009 9:04:32 PM PDT by Polarik

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-171 next last
To: doc1019

Whatayawant?
He’s the Great ShamWow OK?
How long before he has the Hawaii record doctored in
such a fashion that suits ‘em?


21 posted on 04/13/2009 9:56:39 PM PDT by bossmechanic (If all else fails, hit it with a hammer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TheConservativeParty

You said — I wrote numerous letters to the US Supreme Court imploring them to make sure he was a natural citizen before the inauguration, to no avail of course. I read that half a million letters like mine arrived there. They don’t care, are afraid to know, or are in on it. I no longer hold any of the Justices in any high regard, not even Justice Thomas. None of them cared. I wrote to every conservative justice several times. No one there loves the Constitution like we do. They did not do their sworn duty to uphold our Constitution. I hope those ballot initiatives go through. We all need them in every state. My state WI, state of cheating democrats, will never go for that though.

Well, I wouldn’t necessarily criticize the U.S. Supreme Court, because they’re only going to handle the case that is before them. They’re not going to create a different case from the one that has been brought before them. And so far, there has not been a case brought before the US Supreme Court where they have had the issue of the birth certificate as the issue to decide. It’s been other issues that have been brought before them (like “standing” or stopping the election or cancelling the Electoral College vote, stuff like that...).

And also, the US Supreme Court is not going to take evidence for something that has not been through a lower court first and been decided there. You’re not going to introduce new evidence and expect the US Supreme Court to vet the evidence at that level. They don’t do that.

What someone has to do is “bring a case before them” where they can decide the very issue that you’re asking to be decided. And that means it has to have been through the lower courts first, and have stepped through the appeals, first and all the evidence has to have been presented at those lower levels first.

When that happens — then you’ll get the Supreme Court to look at what you want. Until then, there’s nothing they can do for you, no matter how many letters you write or anyone else writes...


22 posted on 04/13/2009 9:58:45 PM PDT by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler

The Keyes v. Bowen case is being appealed in CA, and most certainly still has the potential to do everything you say.

The case is being handled by Gary Kreep of the US Justice Foundation, who is very capable.


23 posted on 04/13/2009 10:01:55 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (Whether you're free or not is not determined by outward circumstance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: doc1019
Might have grabbed the attention of FP participations if you had introduced your information a little bit at a time.

And, maybe a few fewer font changes. It seems that when people change fonts to make more emphasis, they cascade somewhat, while trying to make ever more emphasis. This one starts in caps, goes bold, bolder, changes colors, even bolder, starts underlining, and then goes into italics. It makes the writer look amateurish. I would start by typing all the pertinant facts in a single document, and format it consistently, then add emphasis to a few very salient portions.

24 posted on 04/13/2009 10:07:52 PM PDT by webheart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

I know that there are a lot of posters here who keep looking for “the case” that will do it. I personally don’t hold out hope for that, since it has not worked up to this time.

Now, you say that this case has the right elements to do what I was talking about. *That* would be very interesting for me to see, because I’ve never seen that happen, up to this point in time. That would *definitely* be a *first* ... LOL..

Now, on the other hand, I’ve been working with my own state legislature on something that I figure *will work* for the issue of the birth certificate. Several states are putting through laws that require candidates to prove that they are qualified for office and show the proper documentation. That’s going through in Oklahoma (although I have to check on the status as of late, because I haven’t heard recently what’s going on there...).

If and when that gets passed, Obama won’t be able to be on the ballot here, if he doesn’t have the documentation. From my viewpoint — that seems to have the most potential of “doing something”...


25 posted on 04/13/2009 10:07:59 PM PDT by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Polarik

and we wont even get into his bogus Selective Service card with bogus supporting documentation.


26 posted on 04/13/2009 10:08:10 PM PDT by stylin19a (Obama - the ethically excepted asterisk administration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler; TheConservativeParty
Leo Donofrio has proven it with the 21st President of the United States. Thus, it has happened in the past...

Speculation on my part, but I believe it will also be proven in the future with BO. I don't know just how it will come about, or what the political ramifications will be.

Most people (myself included) did not know Arthur wasn't natural-born, until Donofrio pointed it out on his Web site. Most Americans of my generation were very likely taught in school that natural-born citizens, those uniquely eligible for the Presidency, had to be born on U.S. soil of American citizen parents. I do not believe this is being taught in schools today.

We have never in our nation's history succeeded in legally removing a President from office.

27 posted on 04/13/2009 10:09:09 PM PDT by thecodont
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler

That’s the end game, you bet.


28 posted on 04/13/2009 10:11:06 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (Whether you're free or not is not determined by outward circumstance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Polarik; Seadog Bytes; Calpernia; potlatch; devolve; MeekOneGOP; Grampa Dave; BOBTHENAILER; ...

29 posted on 04/13/2009 10:12:34 PM PDT by PhilDragoo (Hussein: Islamo-Commie from Kenya)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

“The Keyes v. Bowen case is being appealed in CA, and most certainly still has the potential to do everything you say.”

Do you have a link to the appeal?

Has it been filed yet?

STE=Q


30 posted on 04/13/2009 10:13:59 PM PDT by STE=Q ("These are the times that try men's souls." -- Thomas Paine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Polarik


There are questions about his Selective Service Registration as well.

http://www.debbieschlussel.com/archives/2008/11/exclusive_did_n.html

31 posted on 04/13/2009 10:19:15 PM PDT by smokingfrog (Choose your allies carefully.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer
Rather he spends -- now over a million -- on flaks.

I keep seeing these allegations of spending by Obama on lawyers, but I never see any citation. Is this figure anything other than someone's wild guess?

Many of the suits have been brought against state election officials, who are presumably (and properly) defended by the state's Attorney General at taxpayer expense. I'd be surprised if Obama had spent anything close to a million on lawyers in these suits.
32 posted on 04/13/2009 10:22:12 PM PDT by Eagle Forgotten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Polarik

hello sir,

sent you freepmail with a question (which you may have already answered earlier this/last year regarding this natural born status).

aside from that, just a quick note of thanks for your efforts.

God Bless

JG


33 posted on 04/13/2009 10:23:14 PM PDT by Jacksonian Grouch (God has granted us Freedom; we owe Him our courage in return)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STE=Q

I think the appeal is still being prepared.


34 posted on 04/13/2009 10:26:40 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (Whether you're free or not is not determined by outward circumstance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: doc1019
Might have grabbed the attention of FP participations if you had introduced your information a little bit at a time.

(1) What is "FP"?   (2) What is "FP"?

35 posted on 04/13/2009 10:36:40 PM PDT by Buddy B (MSgt Retired-USAF - Year: 1972)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: doc1019; Polarik

“Might have grabbed the attention of FP participations if you had introduced your information a little bit at a time.”

That, doc, is a cheap shot!

I can vouch for Richard Polarik’s activities over the past ten months, not only here at Free Republic but at texasdarlin.wordpress.

Another person, Textdude, was also working on proving the COLB a forgery until dead mutilated rabbits were hung on his doorknob along with a note, “Stop what you’re doing or this will be your children.” Textdude’s wife made him stop working on it, but I think you get my drift.

We have criminals leading our government, people who will commit high crimes to stay in power.

We all ought to be thankful that people like Richard Polarik are out there working for the side of Constitutional government.


36 posted on 04/13/2009 10:51:53 PM PDT by SatinDoll (NO Foreign Nationals as our President!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Polarik
Obama is a muslim who was born in Kenya.

I believe his grandmother before I believe him.


37 posted on 04/13/2009 10:54:44 PM PDT by Prole (Please pray for the families of Chris and Channon. May God always watch over them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eagle Forgotten

He has a total of three law firms working to prevent any documentation concerning his past from ever seeing the light of day. This seems silly. Why hide your admission records to a college, Occidental College, you attended at age eighteen? What horrifying scandal could have existed at that time?

But researchers are clever people, by and large, and some information has come to light despite the best efforts of lawyers.

A group of anti-Obama researchers in Hawaii used personal networking to establish inside contacts at ALL hospitals in the state of Hawaii. Those insiders went through hospital records and discovered that the President’s mother, Stanley Anne (Dunham) Obama, had never been in any of those hospitals during 1961. Barak H. Obama claims to have been born in Hawaii during August 4, 1961.

Something you may not know: Certification of Live Birth documents are for people who don’t have Hawaiian birth certificates. Maya Soetoro, Barak Obama’s half-sister born in Djakarta, Indonesia, has a COLB courtesy of her grandmother Madelaine Dunham. Chiang kai-shek, a Chinese General and opponent of Mao tse-tung, also had a COLB courtesey of his Chinese relatives residing in Hawaii.

The COLB, according to internet bloggers, was originally set up during the years when the big pineapple and fruit companies controlled the territorial government there, so as to protect them from charges of bringing in slave labor from Asia. Don’t know it this last is true, but it wouldn’t surprise me one bit.


38 posted on 04/13/2009 11:09:05 PM PDT by SatinDoll (NO Foreign Nationals as our President!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Polarik
No one who had a real Hawaiian Birth Certificate would have any need to have a Certificate of Live Birth. There is a big difference.

Obama's sister, Maya Kassandra Soetoro-Ng; born August 15, 1970 in Jakarta, Indonesia, has a Hawaiian Certificate of Live Birth because she doesn't have a real Hawaiian Birth Certificate.

This isn't rocket science. The man is a fraud, an impostor, and a usurper, and everything he signs, appoints, negotiates, and commits will be null and void because a remnant of the American people have never acquiesced to this impersonation as a "natural born citizen".

39 posted on 04/13/2009 11:25:47 PM PDT by Obamageddon (This will all end with show trials and piano wire!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheConservativeParty

I am also very very disappointed in our justices. I know some are sold out commies but I also know that some are not. We have good judges sprinkled all over the country. Why doesn’t one pick up on this? I do not understand.

If they find he really is a citizen, so be it. I can accept that. I’m not asking for anyone to build a bizarre case against him. Just have a look at the birth certificate.


40 posted on 04/13/2009 11:29:17 PM PDT by Marie2 (The capacity for self-government is a moral quality. Only a moral people can be free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-171 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson