Learned recently that Law also underwent a similar transformation shortly after Darwinism became the new religion of the atheist.
Before Darwin, Law students studied Blackstone’s commentary on the law as the basis of their legal theory. Blackstone’s commentaries were based in the Judeo-Christian/Biblical foundation. IE, law was based on the objective natural Law of God.
This was replaced at Harvard, post-OoS, with the “evolved case-law” legal theory. One with no basis and subject to the whims of “smart people” like judges who could arbitrarily change the laws because they knew better.
Great article in the Journal of Creation entitled “Darwinian evolution was basis of Nazi legal system: German judges denied the concept of God-given rights”
If you don’t subscribe, it should be available online in the coming months:
http://creation.com/darwinian-evolution-was-basis-of-nazi-legal-system
All the best—GGG
[[This was replaced at Harvard, post-OoS, with the “evolved case-law” legal theory. One with no basis and subject to the whims of “smart people” like judges who could arbitrarily change the laws because they knew better.]]
Yup- we went from taking God’s commands as judges to judge objectively and fairly, to one where the law is ‘open to interpretation’ and the rights of the innocents and victims are no logner upheld as God commands of judges. Judges now try to ‘elevate’ themselves ‘above’ the supreme universal moral code/ethics that God laid down, and we’re powerless to demand that they uphold their sacred oath of office! Our constitution is being torn apart by these subjectively ruling agendists, and the universal moral code is suffering as a result-
God will judge these corrupt judges VERY seriously, because the office of judging is a VERY serious responsibility which these activist judges are ignoring- to hteir own perril- they will be judged MUCH more severely, and the innocents who are victimized by these activist judges will be rewarded for having to have endured INJUSTICE at hte hands of these corrupt activist judges!
This was replaced at Harvard, post-OoS, with the “evolved case-law” legal theory. One with no basis and subject to the whims of “smart people” like judges who could arbitrarily change the laws because they knew better.
Sheer balderdash. Where do you get this nonsense?