What I noticed was that “atlaw” insisted that my assertion about the evolutionary influence on law being the root of anti-constitutionalist judicial activism was absurd,
but then completely ignored my backup material 2 posts later that detailed how law was considered before Darwin and after.
Maybe he has “ping vision”.
The Nazis...yet another revolutionary, environmentalist, materialist monstrosity!
You didn’t ping me to this post, MrB, and as far as I can tell, you didn’t post any “backup material 2 posts” after mine. Is this another example of “congenital creationist dishonesty disorder”?
But let’s set aside your pathological lying for the moment, and focus instead on your bizarre assertion that “the evolutionary influence on law [is] the root of anti-constitutionalist judicial activism.” It should be fascinating to hear you expound on this. Have at it.