Posted on 04/03/2009 9:09:10 AM PDT by NormsRevenge
WASHINGTON (AFP) Some 80 percent of Arctic ice may disappear in 30 years, not 90 as scientists had previously estimated, according to a new study on the impact of global warming.
"The amount of the Arctic Ocean covered by ice at the end of summer by then could be only about 1 million square kilometers, or about 620,000 square miles," said US researchers who authored the study published Thursday.
"That's compared to today's ice extent of 4.6 million square kilometers, or 2.8 million square miles," they added, warning the development "raises the question of ecosystem upheaval."
The scientists made their projections based on models that took accounted for changes in Arctic ice, which saw "dramatic declines" at the end of summer in 2007 and 2008, when the ice surface dropped to 4.3 and 4.6 million square kilometers (1.7 and 1.8 million square miles), respectively.
The models pointed to a "nearly ice-free" Arctic in just 32 years, with some of the models making the same prediction for 11 years from now.
"In recent years, the combination of unusual warm temperatures from natural causes and the global warming signal have worked together to provide an earlier summer sea-ice loss than was predicted," said James Overland of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).
(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...
No Naomi Campbell, Please.
Anyone wanna invest in Al Gore’s plan for an Arctic surfing club?
anybody wanna bet?
Arctic may be ice-free in 30 years: study
Very True:
If the magnetic poles sudden shift to Brazil......
GIGO Model
Garbage In = Garbage Out
I'll believe it when "1-800-sandals" starts advertising a "Time of My Life" in the Arctic.
May, could, might... but actually not happening.
When these “experts” can get the weather correct 4 hours from now, I’ll belive them. Until then they can pound sand or ice.
And maybe not!
Or not.
ML/NJ
More crabs!!!!!!
During the ‘70s this same bunch was claiming that by now we would all have frozen to death unless (and there’s always an unless) we all bought into their stooopid agenda.
Screw them. I’m going to go burn another pile of old tires.
You beat me by 6 seconds.
Then where will the polar bears sit waiting for the seals to surface? And will the North Pole be the North Pond?
(not soon enough!)
First mistake. IIRC, climate models are ridiculously uncertain.
Second, it appears as though the "scientists" adjusted the assumptions for the models based on a two-year observation.
This is a corruption, and of a dubious process in the first place.
By fiddling with assumptions, you can get a model with several (too many) variables to dance to any tune you wish.
(Hmmm, just in time for that Cap and Trade argument, how handy.)
.
I’m gonna get me a real estate shingle and start selling Antarctic Farmland to fools like this.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.