You posted no such thing. There are no theorms on that site. The statements are clearly not theorems, because they not only are illogical statements, they have no possibility of ever being proved. The use of the word theorm on htat site is fraud. "Did you read the logic that proceeded the same?"
There's no logic. There's simply strings of unsupported, illogical, or otherwise useless statements.
If there is no logic, go back to the logic behind each theorem, starting with theorem 1, and show me how each successive theorem does not follow from the logic presented therein.
Please, I mean no disrespect, but I have an observation. You know so much about theorem but seem to have no idea how to correctly spell the word... “theorm, theorems, theorm” one out of three.. I can see the word “that” being spelled “htat” because of a missed keystroke, but to spell the single word that your point refers to wrong not once, but twice is strange... odd.
Are you informed on the subject you are attempting to instruct others about?