[Cindy]

Oops, I should have checked for myself before answering you.

Click on the links below:

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&&rls=en&q=obama+%2B+bows&btnG=Search

http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&rls=en&q=obama%20%2B%20bows&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=wn

[boxerblues]

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&rls=en&q=obama+bows+before+saudi+king

brings up 14,400 results, earlier this morning is was showing over 120,000 results. Goggle is burying this story

[Cindy]

I clicked on the first link in post no. 848:

Quote:

Results 1 - 10 of about 8,570,000 for obama + bows. (0.08 seconds)

I clicked on the second link in post no. 848:

Results 1 – 10 of about 2,018 for obama bows. (0.19 seconds)

My conclusion is that I can find more possible hits in link no. 1 which is a general Google search than in link no. 2 which is a news search.

[1010RD]

You’re right - Google is Google. Type in “Obama bows”, too few people know about using terms and +.

Watch how you get hits in the millions for Obama bowls, but nothing for Obama bows. Google displays the number of times a search was initiated on that term, no?

For “Obama bows” they have nothing. No one has searched on this term?