Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tax-chick

I hope you’re not including me in that statement. I simply think we have to be cautious about using info like this. Killing babies is wrong because killing babies is wrong.


10 posted on 03/30/2009 9:52:25 AM PDT by brytlea (Jesus loves me, this I know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: brytlea
I hope you’re not including me in that statement.

No, it was just a generalization. *Every* mention of a correlation of abortion with a negative outcome brings some dismissals ... "They were just the kind of person to have breast cancer, future miscarriages, depression, alcoholism, suicide attempts, etc., etc.,"

One item by itself might be a legitimate case of "selection bias," as I think they said in statistics class, but dozens of items VERY strongly suggests a causal link.

16 posted on 03/30/2009 11:57:12 AM PDT by Tax-chick ("Never offend people with style when you can offend them with substance." ~Sam Brown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson