I am the moderator that the anti-Mormon posters consider to be pro-Mormon, simply because I enforce the rules about not dragging dogmatic disputes from the Religion Forum into news threads (and for the record, I am not Mormon and am neutral about their religious views).
As a moderator, you can never make everyone happy - for the anti-Mormon hardcores, I must be pro-Mormon for enforcing FR rules when they violate them. I have found that those who carry around sour grapes can only offer you sour wine. And these SPAM-LDS AFers are just as sour as those they decry.
“I am the moderator that the anti-Mormon posters consider to be pro-Mormon, simply because I enforce the rules about not dragging dogmatic disputes from the Religion Forum into news threads (and for the record, I am not Mormon and am neutral about their religious views).
When you use the perjorative, “anti-mormon”, you do indeed
look to be a mormon.
How about using the accurate, “anti-mormonism, and be neutral?
As a moderator, you can never make everyone happy - for the anti-Mormon hardcores, [again, poor language choice that makes it appear you are mormon] I must be pro-Mormon for enforcing FR rules when they violate them. I have found that those who carry around sour grapes can only offer you sour wine. And these SPAM-LDS AFers are just as sour as those they decry.
As a Mormon FReeper, I’ve found the moderators to be quite fair, enforcing the same posting rules for everyone.
And we ALL know know what Rush says about Moderates ;^)