Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"The Tyranny of the Majority" - from Alexis de Tocqueville's "Democracy in America"
Tocqueville.org ^ | 1835 (Volume 1) & 1840 (Volume 2) | Alexis de Tocqueville

Posted on 03/28/2009 8:31:50 AM PDT by Loud Mime

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last
To: Loud Mime

Reasons for the Bill Of Rights reference bump! ;-)


21 posted on 03/28/2009 9:57:42 AM PDT by Tunehead54 (Nothing funny here ;-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Loud Mime
Far from the promise of universal freedom and ubiquitous suffrage there has never been a functional democracy that did not have a permanently oppressed minority.
22 posted on 03/28/2009 10:01:40 AM PDT by Natural Law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aflaak

ping


23 posted on 03/28/2009 10:12:48 AM PDT by r-q-tek86 (The U.S. Constitution may be flawed, but it's a whole lot better than what we have now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Loud Mime

It is clear to all but those willing to compromise their freedom that our Constitution and way of life are under direct attack from within.
We now have a president who is eminently impeachable for violating his oath of office.
It is rapidly growing too late to save our nation. This has been many years coming. We are in the last deays of the republic.
Tyranny is at our doorstep. 2010 will be too late. We must, if we are to save our once great nation, mobilize now.


24 posted on 03/28/2009 10:17:06 AM PDT by Louis Foxwell (0 is the son of soulless slavers, not the son of soulful slaves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Uriah_lost

That’s a good video, but I have some disagreements with some of its content. Thanks, it was a good study.


25 posted on 03/28/2009 10:25:56 AM PDT by Loud Mime (The IRS collectes $1 trillion in taxes each year. Why not forgive all taxes for a year? Stimulus!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: RC2

Who said anything about “without a republic?”


26 posted on 03/28/2009 10:29:07 AM PDT by Huck ("He that lives on hope will die fasting"- Ben Franklin, Poor Richard's Almanac)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Loud Mime

Some quotations regarding the size of a republic...and mind you, this was all brought up in reference to the original 13 colonies...

Whoever seriously considers the immense extent of territory comprehended within the limits of the United States, together with the variety of its climates, productions, and commerce, the difference of extent, and number of inhabitants in all; the dissimilitude of interest, morals, and policies, in almost every one, will receive it as an intuitive truth, that a consolidated republican form of government therein, can never form a perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to you and your posterity, for to these objects it must be directed: this unkindred legislature therefore, composed of interests opposite and dissimilar in their nature, will in its exercise, emphatically be, like a house divided against itself.

Anti-federalist papers, Cato #3

It is natural to a republic to have only a small territory, otherwise it cannot long subsist. In a large republic there are men of large fortunes, and consequently of less moderation; there are trusts too great to be placed in any single subject; he has interest of his own; he soon begins to think that he may be happy, great and glorious, by oppressing his fellow citizens; and that he may raise himself to grandeur on the ruins of his country. In a large republic, the public good is sacrificed to a thousand views; it is subordinate to exceptions, and depends on accidents. In a small one, the interest of the public is easier perceived, better understood, and more within the reach of every citizen; abuses are of less extent, and of course are less protected.

Montesquieu —as quoted by Brutus and Cato, Anti-federalist papers.

It’s funny that conservative all laud the Federalist Papers, and almost never mention the Anti-Federalists. The Founders understood that what they were undertaking was an experiment, not a fixed and known perfect solution. The truth is, much of the warnings of the anti-federalists turned out to be correct. We’d be wise to pay as much attention to them as we do to the Federalists, who on many scores were well-intentioned, but completely wrong, as time has shown. (See the debates regarding “general welfare”, “necessary and proper”, the power of the judiciary, etc)


27 posted on 03/28/2009 10:36:39 AM PDT by Huck ("He that lives on hope will die fasting"- Ben Franklin, Poor Richard's Almanac)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Loud Mime

A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within.

An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known, and he carries his banners openly. But the traitor moves among those within the gates freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very hall of government itself.

For the traitor appears no traitor.

He speaks in the accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their garments, and he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in hearts of men.He rots the soul of a nation.

He works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of a city. He infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to be feared.

-CICERO


28 posted on 03/28/2009 10:37:04 AM PDT by snowrip (Liberal? YOU ARE A GUTLESS SOCIALIST LOSER WITH NO RATIONAL ARGUMENT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Loud Mime

First there is the concept that there are individual retained rights over which power to regulate has not been delegated to government.

10th Amendment - “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people”

Then there is the concept of actional trespass as force or violence with consequence of injury to liberty, security, property and relative equality of rights. There is the maxim of law regarding property: “sic utere tuo ut alienum non laedas” - - each one must so use his own as not to injure his neighbor- This means the individual has liberty bounded only by the equal rights of others.

Then there is the limitation of government regulation
to the protection of the public from substantial injury to the general public health, safety, morals and “welfare”. With the distinction that regulation to advance the “public welfare” is constrained by Fifth Amendment limitations and just compensation for the taking of private property to advance the legitimate public good.

Regulation for anything else such as community concensus, promotion of a popular behavior, lifestyle choice or belief is an encroachment upon individual freedom.

Then there is the heritage of the “rights of Englishmen” at the foundation of our inherited legal tradition and carried forward through the principles of stare decisis. (Vote, jury trial, etc.)

The founders intentionally created a Republic and not a democracy to weaken the tyranny of the majority over the individual. Then they separated powers among three seperate branches of government. They also set up a system of federal “dual soverignty” with a State and a National government, where the national did not have power over the State - each having seperate powers to regulate individual action. They also delegated the national distinct enumerated authorities, carving it from the original powers of the States.

All of this fractured power was to protect the individual and maximize individual freedom/liberty. In contrast, the French felt that the individual surrendered his natural rights for superior civil rights and was subject to the rule of the majority.

Since its creation, the tendancy has been to move from what we were given to a more “democratic,” hierarchial and regulatory America to the sacrifice of individual liberty.


29 posted on 03/28/2009 11:09:36 AM PDT by marsh2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marsh2

Some learned comments on the contents of this site, please, gentlemen and ladies.

And neither be put off by the link or the first two pages, thank you.

http://api.ning.com/files/sJ3BLSM4G3kYuuQ8b6yvlj*jQj-5de*pTXImKlbZgGXl43YvuweTPHjWwEPyUxEGIrLKo79kcV7Voc*PFbukwtaVjAOAKTsw/PFAIMPEACHMENTOUTLINE.pdf


30 posted on 03/28/2009 11:41:17 AM PDT by MurrietaMadman ("...You are no more a protector of the Constitution than am I," Arlen Specter (R-Pa.) shouted)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Uriah_lost

GREAT video! bttt


31 posted on 03/28/2009 12:33:13 PM PDT by Matchett-PI (The brush fire's lit - the revolution has begun! Lead, follow, or get the hell outta the way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Loud Mime

bookmark


32 posted on 03/28/2009 12:36:31 PM PDT by Lorica
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Huck

I heard that Idaho, Washington, Oregon and California will be given to China to pay portion of the U.S. debt. Maybe that will make some people happy!


33 posted on 03/28/2009 1:11:32 PM PDT by Paperdoll ( On the cutting edge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Loud Mime

This is precisely why our founders rejected the idea of a democracy out of hand (They called it mob rule) a chose a republican form of government instead.

Someone needs to let the news readers on TV in on this fact.


34 posted on 03/28/2009 1:17:59 PM PDT by Bigun ("It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere." Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marsh2

Bump for later!


35 posted on 03/28/2009 2:06:08 PM PDT by Marie Antoinette (Proud Clinton-hater since 1998.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Huck

I am familiar with the AF Papers; I must say that although they have their points, I disagree with their total argument. I find the FP’s more convincing.

Remember, the government of today is not the one designed by our founders. The forces of populism have overtaken the ethics that should serve as our guide. People are now voting themselves riches out of the treasury. That was not in the FP’s, nor in the Constitution.


36 posted on 03/28/2009 2:54:58 PM PDT by Loud Mime (Things were better when cigarette companies could advertise and Lawyers could not.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Loud Mime
Remember, the government of today is not the one designed by our founders.

You can say that again! The mercantile republic that is the current, rapidly failing, United States is NOT AT ALL akin to the South Atlantic republicanism laid out by the founders.

37 posted on 03/28/2009 6:32:47 PM PDT by Bigun ("It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere." Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Loud Mime

“Madison defended that by explaining that the Senate represented the State governments, something that the Seventeenth Amendment changed.” And so too, the 17th A indelicately and gradually and unfortunately has undermined the originalists brand of federalism. By-passing states’ interests and state compacts has lead us to a dangerous populism, ie a mob democracy, whereby both chambers are controlled by vox populi sentiments which historically leads to mob rule.


38 posted on 03/28/2009 7:42:18 PM PDT by cthemfly25
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: cthemfly25; Bigun

Forgive my posting such obvious items; you never know who else is reading this stuff, so I reduce the writing down the the LCD, like our schools do.

;^)


39 posted on 03/28/2009 7:54:13 PM PDT by Loud Mime (Things were better when cigarette companies could advertise and Lawyers could not.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Paperdoll

For some time I have believed that the only way the government can cure its debt is to sell property.....lots of it. How else can they do it?

If I were buying, I’d want the channel islands in California first; then the coastlines around Vandenberg AFB.


40 posted on 03/28/2009 7:57:44 PM PDT by Loud Mime (Things were better when cigarette companies could advertise and Lawyers could not.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson