Posted on 03/25/2009 8:03:36 PM PDT by rabscuttle385
Link only, per FR copyright and posting policy
(Excerpt) Read more at washblade.com ...
You threw bricks at me, other FReepers,
and Gov. Palin, you little monkey.
You have followed each one with a change in subject,
ranging from the “Alamo” deaths to other nonsense which
herald some sort of serious mental illness which afflicts you.
You had better get some help. Run.
I hope Palin isn’t as thin skinned as you and the other winners in the ‘pajama patrol.’
“Cake is delicious.”
Well you got me there.
But the facts about his judicial appointments speak for themselves.
http://www.boston.com/news/local/articles/2005/07/25/romney_jurist_picks_not_tilted_to_gop/
“Of the 36 people Romney named to be judges or clerk magistrates, 23 are either registered Democrats or unenrolled voters who have made multiple contributions to Democratic politicians or who voted in Democratic primaries, state and local records show. In all, he has nominated nine registered Republicans, 13 unenrolled voters, and 14 registered Democrats.”
Not cool.
I think you are trying to 3e intentionally o3tuse and are not 3eing intellectually honest.
I'll leave you alone.
mbraynard (RomneyBOT, usually lying or hiding): "There is a confirmation process in MA.
I think you are trying to 3e intentionally o3tuse and are not 3eing intellectually honest.
I'll leave you alone."
Once again, Impy is correct.
Once again, caught with the truth about ROMNEY (naming only liberal murderer-freeing judges)
Romney's FR peanut gallery shows its intelligence with a dumb post trying to change the subject.
The candidates were NAMED by Romney. And ROMNEY always ignored the Governors council
when it was favorable to Romney's antimilitary, profascist, antiConservative policy.
“There is a confirmation process in MA. “
The Governor’s council must approve the Governor’s appointments. The are all rat I 3elieve, 3ut so what? Romney didn’t have to appoint li3erals?
“I think you are trying to 3e intentionally o3tuse and are not 3eing intellectually honest.
I’ll leave you alone.”
Okay m3braynard you do that.
test
Glad you guys weren't around in 1979 telling us all about how Ronald Reagan was going to be the Abortion president.
I even changed the B in my tagline. I'm hilarious. ;=)
"Glad you guys weren't around in 1979 telling us all about how Ronald Reagan was going to be the Abortion president."
Reagan had a couple pockmarks. Romney comparatively , staying with the face analogy, is a leper.
Despite spending $55 million of his own money, Slick Willard lost to cash poor candidates like McCain and Huckabee. Slick Willard’s support was largely an anti-McCain vote. The crazy thing, Slick Willard’s mercanaries bash McCain and Huckabee for RINOish behavior, yet attempt to justify Willard’s even bigger RINOish acts. It was Slick Willard’s dishonesty that doomed him in the primaries.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.