Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bokababe

I’ve been arguing for that very case for the last 3 years.

Government has no business dictating what is or is not marriage. Marriage is a sacrament from G-d.

Why we feel the need to put that holiness into the hands of the most unholy - politicians - I’ll never understand.


91 posted on 03/23/2009 6:35:43 PM PDT by gogogodzilla (Live free or die!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: gogogodzilla
"I’ve been arguing for that very case for the last 3 years. Government has no business dictating what is or is not marriage. Marriage is a sacrament from G-d. Why we feel the need to put that holiness into the hands of the most unholy - politicians - I’ll never understand."

Me, too.

And ironically, what group is the current system (with government deciding what is a "marriage", rather than religious leaders deciding) protecting?

NOT the religious heterosexuals who'd likely get married in a church or synagogue anyway because they consider religious marriage to be sacred. But rather "government defined marriage" is already protecting the nonreligious who'd rather get married by a judge and claim that their secular marriage has the same validity as a religious ceremony.

In short, the walls of "the sanctity of (legal) marriage" have already been breached by non-religious heterosexuals. .

Yet whose leading the charge to protect the rights of the non-religious to call their heterosexual marriage, "sacred"? The Christian Right! It's absurd!

93 posted on 03/23/2009 6:59:35 PM PDT by Bokababe (Save Christian Kosovo! http://www.savekosovo.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson