[Vaquero]

Naw my local Napa ain't too gay friendly either....

[Melinda]

Aw, c’mon. The one on the right in the picture can’t be a woman.

[VR-21]

“Oh, the humanity!”

[ScottinVA]

My birthplace — Good on ya, Napa!

[vladimir998]

How the hell is this news?

Lesbian couple says no to vacation in Napa because town council doesn’t espouse gay cause...so what?

[socal_parrot]

Whoa...

The happy couple...

[Binstence]

Napa is beautiful to begin with and getting more so by the day. Lets hope the armies of Sodom pick a bunch of other places to boycott. Do you think we will ever get Provincetown and Key West back? If majority rules, it is possible.

[JoeDetweiler]

Ahhhh, too bad.......but I understand that Sodom is nice this time of year........

[toomuchcoffee]

I would be in such big trouble if I saw that ‘guy with boobs’. How could I NOT stare?

[unixfox]

CRY
ME
A
RIVER

[Exton1]

As far as I am concerned the Chronicle can’t go under fast enough, this is another propaganda article pushing the homosexual agenda, that is destroying morality. A society has a right to choose its own direction. It has a right to decide what it will Promote, Permit, and Prohibit. It permits civil unions, but dose not want to promote perverse life styles. A society has a right to choose its own direction. It has a right to decide what it will Promote, Permit, and Prohibit. It permits civil unions, but dose not want to promote perverse life styles.

[DirtyHarryY2K]

Homosexual Agenda Ping

Freepmail wagglebee or DirtyHarryY2K to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda ping list.

Be sure to click the FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search link for a list of all related articles. We don't ping you to all related articles so be sure to click the previous link to see the latest articles.

Add keywords homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list.

Checkout: http://SilencingChristians.com

[chris_bdba]

Those are women? Are you sure?

[Fido969]

This is the latest in the Gay Wars - the Lie Of the day is that the gay advocates are now claiming that locations that don't support gay marriage will suffer economically, and those that support gay marriage will have a financial boon.

My suggestion to them would be to take their “economic benefits” and stick them you-know-where, but they'd like that.

[calcowgirl]

So NOT taking ANY position is somehow discriminatory?

These folks will stop at nothing less than a full endorsement of THEIR position.

Dang liberals.

[Alia]

I suppose that means... whites should only enter areas where pro-white resolutions have been passed, ad nauseum.

The article story is such a huge ho-hum, I only read it because there might have been a chance some California gays were growing up. Obviously, hasn't happened yet.