To: bushfamfan
And it was still treason against the mother govt. The United States was British citizens and the country was extremely divided with most remaining Loyalists. But its funny you find the cause of rebelling against a govt ok for taxes but not in the cause of true slavery. Hitler and the Nazis were elected and ruled Germany. It would have been nice to have seen a John Brown rise up there
1) You just Godwinned the thread. Fail.
2) Call the founders of the US traitors if you want, it doesn't help your argument a bit. I pointed out the specific differences between the steps taken by the founders and those by John Brown and you IGNORED each point. Fail.
3) I made no statement about what one can, and cannot, rebel against a government for but you continue to say I did. If the northern states had "rebelled" against the union and seceded from it as legal representatives of their people because they didn't want to be in a slave nation....great. But John Brown represented NOBODY and had NO legal authority at all. I have made these points previously and you studiously IGNORE them. Fail.
To: Arkinsaw
Fact is that you would support bloodshed for taxes but not for true ‘LEGAL’ slavery. FAIL.
165 posted on
03/24/2009 8:17:32 AM PDT by
bushfamfan
(United States of America: July 4, 1776-November 4, 2008)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson