Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/20/2009 7:29:20 PM PDT by rabscuttle385
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: upchuck

Sanford ping!


2 posted on 03/20/2009 7:29:35 PM PDT by rabscuttle385 ("If this be treason, then make the most of it!" —Patrick Henry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385

Bump


3 posted on 03/20/2009 7:30:38 PM PDT by Jet Jaguar (Atlas Shrugged Mode: ON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385

The question is are these Republican governors going to let the Clyburn amendment usurp state executive branch authority?


4 posted on 03/20/2009 7:34:34 PM PDT by Nephi (Like the failed promise of Fascism, masquerading as Capitalism? You're gonna love Marxism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385
But many people do not realize that the stimulus money runs out in 24 months -- at which point South Carolina will be forced to find a new source of funding to sustain the new level of spending, or to make sharp cuts. Sure, I could kick the can down the road; in two years, I'll be safely out of office. But it would be irresponsible.

This is the key point. Why are so many blind to this? Perhaps because of the 'I want what I want and I want it now!' short term obsession.

5 posted on 03/20/2009 8:03:56 PM PDT by RochesterFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385
I left this on the WSJ blog:

The first two sentences of Governor Sanford's piece are critical to the future of the United States. Unless we're just content with witnessing the effective dropping of the last letter "s" from States, those that embrace federalism have got to become more vocal about its merits.

Though politically impossible in the current environment and with the shape of the electorate at large, a push toward decentralizing the taxing authority of the federal government would optimize political cooperation and be more responsive to the voters. The tenth amendment might come to have relevance once again. And a push toward being vocal about the merits of federalism could look like this:

- The federal government would create a budget and then turn around and ask for money from each of the states based on factors such as state population, state landmass size, and state median income per household.

- The states, in turn, would develop their tax legislation to pay their federal share as well as raise revenue for their own public goods.

If we could all be tolerant enough to try this and let the laboratories -- or a market for political policies -- run their experiments, optimization would occur. It would have to. And we would see what the demands for public goods (and their true costs) really are; the free movements of productive people would validate/invalidate those experiments.

If they post it great. If not, there's always some receptive people here to pitch the idea to.

7 posted on 03/20/2009 9:15:36 PM PDT by LowCountryJoe (Do class-warfare and disdain of laissez-faire have their places in today's GOP?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385
This shouldn't be going by unnoticed:

Last week I reached out to the president, asking for a federal waiver from restrictions on stimulus money. I got a most unusual response. Before I even received an acknowledgment of the request from the White House, I got word that the Democratic National Committee was launching campaign-style TV attack-ads against me for making it.

bump

8 posted on 03/22/2009 6:49:33 PM PDT by SittinYonder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson