Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LibertyRocks

no I just simply stated only the legal mother and legal father remain on the record.

since homosexuals can not adopt then they would never be listed. In addition if the father is unknown then the father is listed as unknown as is now.

Only one male and one female on any birth certificate.

IOW if a homosexual woman gives birth and via I.F. and she “marries” in massachusettes the father is listed as unknown. It does NOT put the homosexual fetish partner on the birth certificate.

The homosexuals’ recreational sex life has no place on birth records.


41 posted on 03/20/2009 1:02:55 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: longtermmemmory

I hate to burst your bubble, but homosexuals HAVE the right to adopt in several states.

You either treat ALL ADOPTEES the same, or you stop altering our records in the first place, PERIOD. When it comes down to it this is more about MY RIGHTS as an adoptee to know the TRUTH of my biological origins than it has ANYTHING to do with who adopted me...


44 posted on 03/20/2009 1:06:13 PM PDT by LibertyRocks ( http://LibertyRocks.wordpress.com ~ ANTI-OBAMA STUFF : http://cafepress.com/NO_ObamaBiden08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson