Actually, I'd have to challenge that statement, knowing what I know about how Texas changed its adoption practices to conform to the homosexual political agenda, illegally.
In Texas, a gay cabal at the top of the Texas state government directed Children's Protective Services to start allowing homosexuals to adopt. "Somehow" word got around the homosexual fraction, and gays lined up to adopt, although state statute still forbade their doing so. A conservative state employee noticed the discrepancy and complained that the State's agency was breaking the law. The employee was promptly fired and all administrative recourse denied. That was how Texas law was "changed".
I rather imagine that this process has been repeated, as a template, in several other states. Hence my challenge to your statement.
Since the media won't cover these issues, it would be a major effort to find out whether these adoptions are in fact legal.
That’s something definitely worth looking into. I have found in my past research on this issue that there are SO MANY unethical adoption agencies and brokers out there that you would be shocked to find out about. If there is money to be made they will find a way to make it legal, or find a way around the laws. It wouldn’t surprise me one bit to find out that those same people who passed the laws were involved in the adoption industry as far as — they MAKE money from it.
We know the lobbyists of course are, but it goes deeper than that in many cases. We found the same thing when fighting the records laws. Many of those fighting tooth and nail against changes were adoption agencies and employees who make more money off the secrecy, and in many cases are the same agencies who have been accused of unethical practices.
Keep in mind of course, that I DO RECOGNIZE that there are many WONDERFUL people in the adoption “industry”. And, again, I DO realize adoption is a GOOD THING in the vast majority of cases. I’m merely addressing the problems that need to be fixed in order to make it EVEN BETTER for all involved... :)
I shouldn’t have chosen “pass those laws”, what I should’ve said is “changed” those laws in my post responding to the stuff about how gays came to adopt in the first place, because if what you’re saying is true obviously they subverted the laws, and it wasn’t about any legislative process.
I know people will question perhaps what I meant about making money when in some of these cases the children were adopted through the state and not privately. Well, the state STILL makes money off these children - they also receive federal funds based on the number of children that are in the system at any given time...
This is where problems with other aspects of Child Protective Service agencies comes in (like what was seen in Texas with that church group — Texas (or ANY state) stands to make a TON of money off children in this way... Another dirty little secret (even more money if they can get the kids diagnosed with a behavioral or mental problem even where none exist — many kids waiting to be adopted are on Ritalin — I would hazard to say probably the MAJORITY of them, and that’s just not statistically likely, really...).
As you can tell, there are so many issues and aspects to this. So many things I haven’t even touched on, and this case is but ONE example of probably ALL of these different things if we looked really closely...