Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Alberta's Child
That's Clintonian and arguably to far lesser extent GWB foreign policy.

We need however a strong, if neccessary pro-active foreign policy for America's strength and security (which will benefit the free world too), while vastly shrinking government domestically.

We neither can afford Giuliani-Frum liberalism, nor Buchanan-Paul isolationism.

The above article is ridiculous from the onset for attacking Palin. It may have escaped the authors attention that Frum was viciously bashing Palin. The folks that are worrisome within the GOP are not the hawks, but the domestically liberal hawks.

39 posted on 03/16/2009 8:34:46 AM PDT by SolidWood (Palin: "In Alaska we eat therefore we hunt.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: SolidWood

Good points. I would suggest that there was almost no difference between the U.S. foreign policy agenda under Clinton and under George W. Bush. Their approaches may have been different, but the end result — and the underlying agenda — was nearly identical.


62 posted on 03/16/2009 9:03:50 AM PDT by Alberta's Child (I'm out on the outskirts of nowhere . . . with ghosts on my trail, chasing me there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson