Bluster and claim anything you wish, but you are basing your entire noise-fest upon a false syllogism which ONLY you and obamanoid apologists hold to be 'the only truth' regarding 'natural born citizen'.
Pricks like you bluster that your foolishness has not been refuted. [prick = little nettle, nothing more] You don't deserve the repeated posting of material which expose your childish demands for the obamanoid defense mechanism you serve.
Who do you presume yourself to be that you demand someone refute your flawed syllogism? You aren't entering this a fresh. You've been reading the many and varied notions regarding the issue of what the founders meant with 'natural born citizen'. The Supreme court has deigned to ignore the need to clarify that. You're trying your obamanoid best to conflate the realities and make this a cut and dried slam dunk for your president. But your president is a fraud, a liar, and has not been vetted and certainly has not proven he is eligible by Constitutional standard.
Perhaps you are emboldened because the scotus has shown their perfidy toward my Constitution by ignoring the standing of a sovereign citizen to demand the man running for the office of president prove he is Constitutionally eligible. But stuff your feigned indignation at my not 'refuting' your very flawed and agenda-laden syllogism.
MHG - I think you left out a “not” -
“Yes, his parents are now naturalized, but they were not when he was born in the US so he is [NOT] a natural born citizen as per the common sense reasoning of the founders who were most interested in allegiance not geography.”
(Very well said comments.)