[Kansas58]

From the evidence available, from the only decisions Congress has made on the subject, it appears that Congress has made a distinction between “naturalized” and “natural born” Citizen.

By and large, almost every Citizen fits into one of these two groups.

I can find no authority, anywhere, which shows that a person who was a Citizen, at Birth, is not, simultaneously, a Natural Born Citizen.

I do take note of the fact that you seem to admit, now, that I MIGHT be right.

You simply claim, now, that I have not been proven correct.

[so_real]

I concede only that if the legislature and legal system (grew a pair and) further defined “natural born” you could *become* correct. But until then, the language of Morrison Remick Waite and John Bingham stands as the most authoritative definition available. Ergo, in the language of my Constitution itself, every human being born within the jurisdiction of the United States of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is a natural born citizen. And, until we legally add to it, that is where it stands.