[Ultra Sonic 007]

And, in my view, it is those who won't fight for the protection of innocent little children on every single front and at every single opportunity who are callous.

So what's callous about overturning Roe v. Wade and letting the state's have a go at it at this moment in time? You have more honest and open debate. More opportunity to change minds.

And by virtue of the fact that there WILL be pro-life states in such a scenario, there will be LESS ABORTIONS.

And it's a far more feasible scenario with a currently uneducated public than going for a Constitutional amendment banning abortion that goes nowhere. Sticking to the Constitution as is, as you suggested in post 194, won't help unless people are properly educated as to to WHAT'S happening in an abortion. Because how are they going to view the Constitution as being against abortion if they don't view such an act as bereaving their posterity of liberty?

[EternalVigilance]

Your entire post negates natural law and what the Founders called self-evident truth: That our right to life comes from our Creator, and that the protection of such is the very purpose of government.

Thatt’s the Stephen A. Douglas Democrat, Gerald R. Ford Republican, position, which the polar opposite of the Reagan pro-life plank that to this day remains in the Republican Party platform, even though Republican leaders completely abrogate it en masse.