Skip to comments.
Palin appoints former Planned Parenthood board member to Alaska Supreme Court
The Alaska Standard ^
| March 5, 2009
| Dan fagan
Posted on 03/06/2009 9:15:49 AM PST by EternalVigilance
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 401-404 next last
To: BufordP; rabscuttle385; EternalVigilance
And yet, she has no legal recourse under Alaska Law no matter what any individual has to say about demanding anything from the Council.
She has no choice under Alaska Law, she has to select from the candidates given to her by the Alaska Judicial Council.
Nice try, though, on trying to besmearch Sarah Palin.
I’d give you the benefit on the doubt on this one, but as the other links on this thread prove, this issue has already been thrashed out and she did the right thing.
61
posted on
03/06/2009 9:53:44 AM PST
by
SoConPubbie
(GOP: If you reward bad behavior all you get is more bad behavior.)
To: EternalVigilance
She isnt pro-life anyway. Like Ron Paul and John McCain, shes pro-choice for states. The delusions run deep in the Republican Party these days
Care to prove that with links?
Or are baseless accusations your method of operation du jour?
62
posted on
03/06/2009 9:54:46 AM PST
by
SoConPubbie
(GOP: If you reward bad behavior all you get is more bad behavior.)
To: EternalVigilance
The best spin you can put on this is that the judicial council runs Alaska. She could have put her foot down and not appointed anyone until they came back with an acceptable nominee. That would have been within her constitutional purview. Silly me for thinking that the Governor of a state has to abide by the law. I forgot that the uber-pure crowd demands illegal actions in pursuit of their objectives, because their motives are so pure.
63
posted on
03/06/2009 9:54:47 AM PST
by
kevkrom
("The man who reads nothing at all is better educated than the man who reads nothing but newspapers.")
To: SoConPubbie
64
posted on
03/06/2009 9:56:34 AM PST
by
mnehring
To: GinaLolaB
She is a loser for picking the abortionist. Get over it, Gina! We've already explained the law and the context here, and if you can't accept the truth, then you need to get off this thread.
65
posted on
03/06/2009 9:56:44 AM PST
by
Virginia Ridgerunner
(Sarah Palin is a smart missile aimed at the heart of the left!)
To: EternalVigilance
The best spin you can put on this is that the judicial council runs Alaska.
She could have put her foot down and not appointed anyone until they came back with an acceptable nominee. That would have been within her constitutional purview.
But I guess these things arent worth fighting for.
Once again, prove your point with links to relevant information.
Your posting a opinion as if it is fact without any supporting material.
So far all you look like is someone who either dislikes Sarah Palin, shilling for another candidate, or is afraid of Sarah.
Please provide some supporting information.
66
posted on
03/06/2009 9:57:28 AM PST
by
SoConPubbie
(GOP: If you reward bad behavior all you get is more bad behavior.)
To: Beagle8U; kevkrom
If it is true that Alaska is stuck with a choice between only these 2, why not pick the old dude with the beard because he won't last as long for one thing. Also, he might not be an abortionist. The abortionist woman looks very young and spry. She can do alot of damage.
67
posted on
03/06/2009 9:57:28 AM PST
by
GinaLolaB
(=^..^=)
To: SoConPubbie
Sarah Palin on World News with Charles Gibson
September 12, 2008
CHARLES GIBSON: In the time I have left, I want to talk about some social issues.
SARAH PALIN: OK.
GIBSON: Roe V Wade. You think it should be reversed?
PALIN: I think it should, and I think that states should be able to decide that issue.
68
posted on
03/06/2009 9:58:30 AM PST
by
EternalVigilance
( TR: "Walk softly and carry a big stick." BHO: "Mince softly and carry a spaghetti noodle.")
To: mnehrling
Thanks for fighting the good fight and trying to reduce the nonsense
To: Virginia Ridgerunner
Get over it, Gina! We've already explained the law and the context here, and if you can't accept the truth, then you need to get off this thread. Stop trying to defend the indefensible Virginia. We don't want abortionists for anything including dog catchers.
70
posted on
03/06/2009 9:59:39 AM PST
by
GinaLolaB
(=^..^=)
To: GinaLolaB
You don’t know what the hell you are talking about...!
71
posted on
03/06/2009 10:00:35 AM PST
by
Virginia Ridgerunner
(Sarah Palin is a smart missile aimed at the heart of the left!)
To: kevkrom
The trolls are out in full force today. The Messiah must have given them a day off yesterday to use their food stamps.
Sarah Palin is pro-life and has a special needs child. If that doesn’t establish her pro-life credentials in stone nothing will. Is the Pope Catholic?
In addition Sarah is supported by Team Sarah, a pro-life group with over 70,000 members.
And finally even the MSM, after all they have done to smear Sarah, is not even claiming that Sarah in not pro-life.
Trolls, move on to a different issue. You’re not on solid ground here.
72
posted on
03/06/2009 10:00:59 AM PST
by
techno
To: EternalVigilance
PALIN: I think it should, and I think that states should be able to decide that issue. Remind me how you get a Constitutional Amendment? Oh yea, 2/3ds of Senate, House, and States.... If the States take the issue, you know you can get it as a Constitutional amendment once 2/3rds of the States get it, in the mean time, you are reducing abortion State by State.. all a matter of strategy. It is dishonest, and bearing false witness to accuse someone of being pro-abortion because you don't agree with the strategy.
73
posted on
03/06/2009 10:01:01 AM PST
by
mnehring
To: EternalVigilance
Sarah Palin on World News with Charles Gibson
September 12, 2008
So explain how that makes here weak on Abortion?
Has she said she is against the Human Life Amendment to the US Constitution?
74
posted on
03/06/2009 10:01:03 AM PST
by
SoConPubbie
(GOP: If you reward bad behavior all you get is more bad behavior.)
To: SoConPubbie
The “supporting information” is the Alaska Constitution. You can Google it and read it as well as I can.
75
posted on
03/06/2009 10:01:09 AM PST
by
EternalVigilance
( TR: "Walk softly and carry a big stick." BHO: "Mince softly and carry a spaghetti noodle.")
To: GinaLolaB; Sarah Barracuda
...trying to wonder if you’re being sarcastic there...
If not, then consider that - by Alaska Law - she can only pick appoint those forwarded to her by the judicial council. She had the pick of a hardcore leftist liberal...and a regular liberal, by the looks of things.
Who do you think she’s going to choose?
76
posted on
03/06/2009 10:01:28 AM PST
by
Ultra Sonic 007
(To view the FR@Alabama ping list, click on my profile!)
To: SoConPubbie
Unalienable rights are unalienable everywhere.
77
posted on
03/06/2009 10:01:46 AM PST
by
EternalVigilance
( TR: "Walk softly and carry a big stick." BHO: "Mince softly and carry a spaghetti noodle.")
To: GinaLolaB
“If it is true that Alaska is stuck with a choice between only these 2, why not pick the old dude with the beard because he won’t last as long for one thing. Also, he might not be an abortionist. The abortionist woman looks very young and spry. She can do alot of damage.”
Sure, there are tons of rabid barking moonbat hippies that are staunch pro-life advocates.
Why post anything if you don’t have a clue about it?
78
posted on
03/06/2009 10:02:27 AM PST
by
Beagle8U
(FreeRepublic -- One stop shopping ....... Its the Conservative Super WalMart for news .)
To: techno
Bearing false witness doesn’t seem to be a problem for some Christians..
79
posted on
03/06/2009 10:02:34 AM PST
by
mnehring
To: GinaLolaB
Gee and I thought she only liked to kill and gut defenseless animals I didnt she liked the killing of unborn humans as well. Oh well, it is good to find out now. Sarah did NOT point a former member of Planned parent hood, the group had a different name when the appointee was a member and they were not yet an abortion supporting group. Study facts, not MSM articles.
80
posted on
03/06/2009 10:02:36 AM PST
by
calex59
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 401-404 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson