Palin appoints former Planned Parenthood board member to Alaska Supreme Court

The Alaska Standard ^ | March 5, 2009 | Dan fagan

[Deb]

You’re insane.

[Deb]

Let’s go get a burger.

[kevkrom]

It’s a deal.

[mnehring]

EV for full disclosure, do you or did you work directly for a third party candidate running against the Republican ticket in 2008? Where you or are you still on this candidate’s payroll?

(I know the answer, but I think it is fair everyone know this.)

[Ol' Sparky]

So make your case for her only other choice which was Eric Smith.

Pro-life groups in the state were making the case for Smith.

And, how refusing to chose EITHER and demanding another choice?

[AuntB]

You’re over the top on this one, EV. You sound a bit like Ashley Judd. Ashley was wrong about Palin and wolves......

Just in.....

KPVI Staff
Salazar OKs Wolf Removal From Endangered List
http://www.kpvi.com/Global/story.asp?S=9960223

[pissant]

Thank goodness. The mask is off. This should end all the Palin is Reagan in a skirt nonsense.

[Ultra Sonic 007]

Oh geez pissant, not you too.

Repost!

xxxx

Article 4, § 5 of the Alaska Constitution: “The governor shall fill any vacancy in an office of supreme court justice or superior court judge by appointing one of two or more persons nominated by the judicial council.”

She had no choice in the matter. Pick the hardcore leftist, or the one who was less left.

She went with the gal who was less left.

Also, did or does Palin know that Christen is pro-abortion. The group was not planned parenthood at the time, they didn’t promote abortions at the time, the application linked above makes no mention of it.

You are accusing Palin of nominating a pro-abortion candidate when we DON’T KNOW that Christen is pro-abortion. You are making the assumption based on what the MSM says. You should know better.

Again, the more important question- Why is this Alaskan’s for Life promoting the more liberal, pro-abortion Smith? Don’t you think that question raises red flags about their charge?

xxxx

(wonders how many times I’m going to have to repost this...)

[mnehring]

A supposedly pro-life group was pimping Smith. The main one, the National Right to Life of Alaska hadn't even gotten into this debate and as of last night, still hadn't. As we know from other instances, just because one group claims to be a pro-life group doesn't mean they are. It doesn't mean they had correct information either.

[SoConPubbie]

BS. He supports killing persons at the embryonic stage. He and Palin ran ads during the late campaign promoting spending more tax dollars on doing so, even.

Now you have passed over into lying about Sarah.

She has never supported Embryonic Stem-Cell research and you know it.

You cannot present any links that prove she supports this.

Your post makes you out to be disingenuous and a liar.

[KevinDavis]

Read the facts from other people, not EV...

[SoConPubbie]

Thank goodness. The mask is off. This should end all the Palin is Reagan in a skirt nonsense.

Not you too???

Have you read the thread?

There is no factual support for any of this!

[AuntB]

?

Take another look, pissant.

[SolidWood]

Thank goodness. The mask is off. This should end all the Palin is Reagan in a skirt nonsense.

You third Party folks (EV aswell) are callous.

Before making such ignorant and rotten comments, would you bother to read first? Goodness!

[EternalVigilance]

It was McCain and Palin who were disingenuous about this during the campaign. They ran ads which didn’t specify embryonic vs. adult stem cells. In light of McCain’s consistent support for embryonic destruction though, the implications were clear to those who pay attention to these things, and who aren’t caught up in this cult of personality that has grown up around her.

[ansel12]

“Pro-life groups in the state were making the case for Smith.”

---

So give me the deep background on him. What is the long list of those groups?

[EternalVigilance]

National Right to Life

LOL..

You mean the utterly compromised, wholly-owned, subsidiary of the RNC and Mitt Romney?

[Diana in Wisconsin]

According to the article, she’d have to change Alaska’s Constitution to do a direct appointment of her own (The Governor’s) choosing.

Be careful what you wish for. Your next Governor might be a Socialist like mine is in Wisconsin.

[mnehring]

You know, the way to change this story is for Palin to suddenly change to the American Constitution Party or other third party, then I bet, with no R behind her name, these folks will jump in to fact checking the media and come to the same conclusion we have.. the “R” blinders are a terrible thing. It makes people go so far as to trust the MSM..

[EternalVigilance]

You third Party folks (EV aswell) are callous.

You're entitled to your opinion, just like I am. And, in my view, it is those who won't fight for the protection of innocent little children on every single front and at every single opportunity who are callous.