We have irrefutable proof that evolution is a fact. Have you not read of super bacteria which have developed resistance to antibiotics? That is evolution. There is no denying it. It is an event that has been observed in our lifetimes.
Incredible that the scientific community didn’t get your memo!
The responsible group of Georgia parents concerned about evolution being taught as fact and not theory have been slandered and ridiculed when they dared place stickers on science textbooks reminding students evolution is theory and NOT fact; and here’s proof positive that godless liberals and their ilk need to be reigned in, as if we somehow needed more proof.
BTW, adaptation is not the same thing as evolution. Implying such is frankly every bit as desperate as suing people not over science but because of their vast liberal insecurities and multiple hang-ups with God to remove stickers to prevent them from telling children the truth.
Also, you apparently didn’t get the memo too that evolution isn’t an event but a process.
so what did these superbacteria evolve into?
mammals?
birds?
a sarcastic FReeper?
BTW, adaptation is not the same thing as evolution. Implying such is frankly every bit as desperate as suing people not over science but because of their vast liberal insecurities and multiple hang-ups with God to remove stickers to prevent them from telling children the truth.
Also, you apparently didn’t get the memo too that evolution isn’t an event but a process.
Read post 127. I expounded a bit on my earlier comment. I don't know why you call me desperate. I'm a very conservative, 100% cretionist, Bible-believing Christian who is not afraid of the truth. Why? Because all truth is God's truth. And I'm not one to read things into the Bible that aren't there.
That is an example of microevolution. And we do have "irrefutable proof" that it happens.
I suspect the Georgia parents don't worry much about microevolution being taught to their children, though they are right to insist that it is a theory, not a "fact."
Macroevolution, on the other hand, is "a horse of a different color." It is more of a doctrine than a theory, it seems to me, because there's really no way to test it. Because of this doctrinal quality, it is questionable whether it's even science.
FWIW, JMHO. Thank you so much for writing, tpanther!