[pawdoggie]

I looks like too many of these lawsuits are trying to put the cart before the horse. Until they can resolve the issue of “standing”, they’re not going anywhere, no matter how well-reasoned the logic. Maybe a first step would be to sue the Federal Election Commission (or individual state electors or US Congressmen) for not challenging Obama’s eligibility in the first place. If the USSC agrees with the Election Commission that they lack “standing”, then the plaintiff might at least have an opportunity to ask, “then who does have standing?”.

[FreeManN]

“Maybe a first step would be to sue the Federal Election Commission (or individual state electors or US Congressmen) for not challenging Obama’s eligibility in the first place.”

HUH? Read the cases. “FEC & US Congressmen” have been sued & electors have been challenged.

Standing is no longer the problem. Current problem is jurisdiction but that is about to change.

[Michael Michael]

I looks like too many of these lawsuits are trying to put the cart before the horse. Until they can resolve the issue of “standing”, they’re not going anywhere, no matter how well-reasoned the logic.

After Obama was sworn into office on January 20th, all of the lawsuits became moot. Under the Constitution, the only way a sitting President can be removed from office is by impeachment in the House and subsequent conviction in the Senate of bribery, treason, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.