The problem isn't me, it's you ~ you think you've got all the evidence you need in this case but you don't.
You're like Obama ~ he thinks that because he passed a bar exam that makes him an economist.
He's still a two-bit near-downtown Chicago lawyer who preys on an unquestioning ethnic constituency.
Guy will never get into the big time ~
There's a lot to this case with the cop that's not obvious. We don't have the soundtrack for one thing, and secondly, she's on her way to juvenile court for car theft so we'll never hear what she has to say now that she's figured out what her place is in the grand scheme of things.
You are right, I don’t get it. I see 2 big men, one small underage person. I see no excuse whatsoever for their attack on a small, underage female. There is no reason whatsoever that I can see where this is justified.
She was just kicking off her shoe in his general direction. Kind of like “fine, you want my shoe, here it is”. If she had picked up the shoe and hurled it at his head, there would still be no justification for his actions.
And then to see him lie just takes the cake. He hurt his shin attacking a child and then tried to pass it off as her shoe hitting him and he has to go to the hospital for a hematoma (did I read that right??)
Anyway, heading to bed. I’m glad I don’t have to deal with brat kids but I’m pretty sure of one thing, if her mother had done to her what the officers did, she’d find herself in jail and the same officers would look down their noses at her for being a child abuser.