[laweeks]

“Gleason: Pa. GOP may not back Specter”

“MAY NOT BACK SPECTOR’????? Well, give me any reason why they SHOULD . . . Why do they even have any doubts? The guy’s a traitor and a socialist . . . case closed??????

[Born Conservative]

Agreed. It would have been nice if he said WILL not back Specter...

[Servant of the Cross]

The content is even worse than the headline. Like you, I question why even use the word "may". But get this other comment by Gleason from the article!:

Gleason said that -- "right now -- he is 100 percent supportive of Specter" ...

[mort56]

I agree with laweeks. May not support? May not support? That opens up the possibility that they will support. Spector should have already lost his committee assignments and the Gleason should have demanded this man resign not pussy foot around.

Again if anyone finds the Republican Party’s testicles could you please forward them to Micheal Steele! I am not sure he will know how to use them but at least it is a start!

[mombrown1]

With what is going on behind the scenes - Gleason will be gone and state committee will not endorse Specter.